The Motion (ROA # 25) of Plaintiff Carleton Hargrove ("Plaintiff'), individually and on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act, for an order compelling Defendant San Diego County Credit Union ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Plaintiff s Special Interrogatories (Set One) Nos. 1 - 4, and for monetary sanctions against Defendant and its counsel of record, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP., is CONTINUED to Friday March 6, 2020 at 9:00 am in D 73.
The Court notes that, according to Defendant, the case of Rina Beltran v. San Diego County Credit Union, 37-2019-00015722-CU-OE-CTL, is related to this case and is currently assigned to Judge Medel in D 66. Defendant also represents that a hearing on Defendant's Motion to consolidate this case with the Beltran case before Judge Medel is set for Friday February 21, 2020. In the interest of judicial economy, the Court continues this hearing until after Judge Medel has ruled o
Hearing Date
February 10, 2020
Category
Civil - Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
The Motion (ROA # 25) of Plaintiff Carleton Hargrove ("Plaintiff'), individually and on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act, for an order compelling Defendant San Diego County Credit Union ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Plaintiff s Special Interrogatories (Set One) Nos. 1 - 4, and for monetary sanctions against Defendant and its counsel of record, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP., is CONTINUED to Friday March 6, 2020 at 9:00 am in D 73.
The Court notes that, according to Defendant, the case of Rina Beltran v. San Diego County Credit Union, 37-2019-00015722-CU-OE-CTL, is related to this case and is currently assigned to Judge Medel in D 66. Defendant also represents that a hearing on Defendant's Motion to consolidate this case with the Beltran case before Judge Medel is set for Friday February 21, 2020. In the interest of judicial economy, the Court continues this hearing until after Judge Medel has ruled o