The Motion (ROA # 127, 132) of Plaintiffs Tara M. Adams and Justin J. Adams ("Plaintiffs") for an award of attorney's fees and costs and expenses, pursuant to Civil Code 1794(d) of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, as the prevailing party pursuant to the express terms of the Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer accepted on or about November 22, 2017, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Plaintiffs' evidentiary objections (ROA # 136) are OVERRULED.
Defendants FCA US LLC AND BOB BAKER AUTOMOTIVE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA BOB BAKER CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE RAM ("Defendants") do not dispute Plaintiffs' right to be awarded attorney fees but argue that "the amount Plaintiff is now demanding is nothing short of excessive." ROA # 133 at page. 2.
The Court finds that the services performed by Plaintiffs, as described in the declarations of attorneys Steve Mikhov (ROA # 130) and Richard M. Wirtz (ROA # 131) are reasonable and necessary. The Court also finds that their hourly
Hearing Date
June 11, 2018
Category
Civil - Unlimited
Type
Breach of Contract/Warranty
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
The Motion (ROA # 127, 132) of Plaintiffs Tara M. Adams and Justin J. Adams ("Plaintiffs") for an award of attorney's fees and costs and expenses, pursuant to Civil Code 1794(d) of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, as the prevailing party pursuant to the express terms of the Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer accepted on or about November 22, 2017, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Plaintiffs' evidentiary objections (ROA # 136) are OVERRULED.
Defendants FCA US LLC AND BOB BAKER AUTOMOTIVE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA BOB BAKER CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE RAM ("Defendants") do not dispute Plaintiffs' right to be awarded attorney fees but argue that "the amount Plaintiff is now demanding is nothing short of excessive." ROA # 133 at page. 2.
The Court finds that the services performed by Plaintiffs, as described in the declarations of attorneys Steve Mikhov (ROA # 130) and Richard M. Wirtz (ROA # 131) are reasonable and necessary. The Court also finds that their hourly