Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Modiri

Case No.: 30-2019-01067609    

Plaintiff Well Fargo Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted.
The Complaint alleges six causes of action against Defendant Ramin Modiri for breach of contract and common counts. On June 26, 2020, Defendant filed his Answer and admitted “all of the statements of the complaint [] are true,” except, Defendant explained he “tried to settle this case [] numerous times.” (ROA 8 [Answer at p. 1, ¶ 3.b.].) Under affirmative defenses, Defendant further explained he contacted Plaintiff “from 06/2018 till 03/2019 to make financial arrangements,” and, “while other financial organizations worked with Defendant to make arrangements,” Plaintiff “would not agree.” (Answer at p. 2, ¶ 4.)
Applicable Law
A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a general demurrer. (People v. $20,000 U.S. Currency (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 682, 691.) Where, as here, the plaintiff is moving for judgment on its own pleading, the motion shall be mad........