DFT - Reliable Energy Management, Inc., George R Garcia (1) Demurrer to Complaint (2) Motion to Strike Complaint DFT - Pw Stephens Environmental, Inc. (3) Demurrer to Complaint (4) Motion to Strike Complaint
(1)DEMURRER (Defendant Reliable Energy Management, Inc.) (2)DEMURRER (Defendant PW Stephens Environmental, Inc.)
Defendant Reliable Energy Management, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiffs’ seventh cause of action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend.
Defendant PW Stephens Environmental, Inc.’s special demurrer to Plaintiffs’ third cause of action for breach of contract, and general demurer to the fourth cause of action for breach of the implied covenant, sixth cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and the seventh cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is also SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend.
A demurrer presents an issue of law regarding the sufficiency of the allegations set fort
Hearing Date
April 25, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
DFT - Reliable Energy Management, Inc., George R Garcia (1) Demurrer to Complaint (2) Motion to Strike Complaint DFT - Pw Stephens Environmental, Inc. (3) Demurrer to Complaint (4) Motion to Strike Complaint
(1)DEMURRER (Defendant Reliable Energy Management, Inc.) (2)DEMURRER (Defendant PW Stephens Environmental, Inc.)
Defendant Reliable Energy Management, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiffs’ seventh cause of action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend.
Defendant PW Stephens Environmental, Inc.’s special demurrer to Plaintiffs’ third cause of action for breach of contract, and general demurer to the fourth cause of action for breach of the implied covenant, sixth cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and the seventh cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is also SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend.
A demurrer presents an issue of law regarding the sufficiency of the allegations set fort