Defendant’s (County of Orange) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Summary Adjudication, filed on 1-29-20 under ROA No. 172, is CONTINUED to 11-24-20 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C19.
Plaintiff (Victoria Gleason) requests the court to continue the hearing hearing on the Motion to allow Plaintiff to obtain additional evidence.
Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (h), provides, “If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the opposition response to the motion is due.”
Lerma v. County of Orange
Hearing Date
September 08, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Defendant’s (County of Orange) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Summary Adjudication, filed on 1-29-20 under ROA No. 172, is CONTINUED to 11-24-20 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C19.
Plaintiff (Victoria Gleason) requests the court to continue the hearing hearing on the Motion to allow Plaintiff to obtain additional evidence.
Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (h), provides, “If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the opposition response to the motion is due.”
Lerma v. County of Orange