Plaintiff moves for summary adjudication “regarding Defendant Chavez asserting in his Answer to Plaintiff’s complaint the affirmative defenses of because those defenses asserted by Chavez are without merit and barred based upon the uncontroverted testimony of Chavez, which provides undisputed evidence that Defendant Vo was Chavez’s employee per the California Supreme Court’s restating the test for determining whether someone is an employee or an independent contractor in Dynamex Operation West v. Sup. Ct. (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903.” Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion, Pg. 2.
Defendant Vo has filed a Notice of Joinder of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Adjudication.
Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350(b) states, “If summary adjudication is sought, whether separately or as an alternative to the motion for summary judgment, the specific cause of action, affirmative defense, claims for damages, or issues of duty must be stated specifically in the notice of motion and be repeated, verbatim, in the separate sta