The Defendant Professional Community Management, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Francisco Diaz is DENIED. The Defendant Professional Community Management, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Adjudication of the third and fourth causes of action is GRANTED. The Defendant Professional Community Management, Inc. Motion for Summary Adjudication of the first, second, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth cause of action is DENIED.
Plaintiff acknowledges that Neisendorf v. Levi Strauss & Co., precludes his third and fourth causes of action for Interference and Failure to Reinstate in Violation of the CFRA. Neisendorf v. Levi Strauss & Co., (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 509. The plaintiff has agreed to dismiss those causes of action.
The defendant PCM argues that the plaintiff’s complaint and each cause of action pled is barred as a matter of law, because Plaintiff cannot demonstrate that he was denied leave under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), that his termination was motiva