Case Number:
23STCV12358
Hearing Date:
March 18, 2024
Dept:
15
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

Plaintiffs MIL No. 1


Plaintiff moves to exclude improper questions and comments to the jury.

This is not a proper use of a motion in limine.

The trial court will have its own rules about proper voir dire.

The motion is denied without prejudice to objections at trial.

Plaintiffs MIL No. 2


Plaintiff moves to exclude evidence and references to speculative asbestos exposure while Plaintiff was in the military.

This motion is deemed made and denied pursuant to the July 8, 2022 CMO.

Plaintiff did not show good cause to depart from that order.

The motion is denied without prejudice to objections at trial.

Defendants MIL No. 1

Defendant Honeywell moves to exclude all references to foreign bans on the importation of chrysotile asbestos.

Plaintiff did not show any defendant was aware of a foreign ban on chrysotile asbestos