Re: Shogy Ahmed v. Hliam Saleh
Superior Court Case No. 23CECG03036
Hearing Date: March 7, 2024 (Dept. 502)
Motion: By Plaintiff for Preliminary Injunction
Tentative Ruling:
To deny, without prejudice.
Explanation:
The court’s exercise of its discretion to grant a preliminary injunction depends on
the interrelated factors of the probable outcome at trial and whether the “harm that the
plaintiff is likely to sustain if the injunction were denied as compared to the harm that the
defendant is likely to suffer if the preliminary injunction were issued.” (IT Corp. v. County
of Imperial (1983) 35 Cal.3d 63, 69-70; see also Code Civ. Proc., § 526, subd. (d)(2)
[Injunctive relief appropriate “[w]hen it appears by the complaint or affidavits that the
commission or continuance of some act during the litigation would produce waste, or
great or irreparable injury, to a party to the action.”]
Hearing Date
March 07, 2024
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Re: Shogy Ahmed v. Hliam Saleh
Superior Court Case No. 23CECG03036
Hearing Date: March 7, 2024 (Dept. 502)
Motion: By Plaintiff for Preliminary Injunction
Tentative Ruling:
To deny, without prejudice.
Explanation:
The court’s exercise of its discretion to grant a preliminary injunction depends on
the interrelated factors of the probable outcome at trial and whether the “harm that the
plaintiff is likely to sustain if the injunction were denied as compared to the harm that the
defendant is likely to suffer if the preliminary injunction were issued.” (IT Corp. v. County
of Imperial (1983) 35 Cal.3d 63, 69-70; see also Code Civ. Proc., § 526, subd. (d)(2)
[Injunctive relief appropriate “[w]hen it appears by the complaint or affidavits that the
commission or continuance of some act during the litigation would produce waste, or
great or irreparable injury, to a party to the action.”]