# 6 TENTATIVE RULING 9:15 a.m., Wednesday, August 4, 2021

HELIOPORO MELO v. SO. CAL. PIZZA CO., LLC, et al. [21STCV05408]

RULING ON MOTION OF DEFENDANTS SO. CAL. PIZZA CO., LLC and SOCAL PIZZA HOLDINGS LLC TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION

BACKGROUND: Action for age discrimination and wrongful term -

TIMELINE:

o/a 11/22/16: Plaintiff allegedly began working for defendants, who

allegedly do business as “Pizza Hut,” as a pizza delivery driver.

Plaintiff, who was in his late 60s when he was hired, alleges that

he was subjected to age discrimination during his employment –

e.g., coworkers and his supervisor, Randy Loza, would call him

“abuelito” [meaning “grandpa]”; also, Mr. Loza allegedly

continuously showed preference to younger deliverymen,

and assigned Plaintiff the furthest deliveries and the least favorable hours

on or about February 25, 2019: Mr. Loza allegedly started reducing Mr. Melo’s hours from 40 hours to 25, and ultimately to 2 hours per week

after 7/13/19: