Case Number:
21STCP03501
Hearing Date:
August 24, 2022
Dept:
86
CHATHAM v. BARGMANN,
et al.
Case Number:
21STCP03501
Hearing Date: August 24, 2022
[Tentative]
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
On October 20, 2022, Petitioner, Aaron Chatham, by and through his guardian
ad litem
and conservator, Mary Jane Leonhardi, filed a petition against Respondents, Nancy Bargmann, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) and Los Angeles County Developmental Services Foundation, Inc., d/b/a Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center (FDLRC). FDLRC is also named as a Real Party in Interest. The petition sets forth two causes of action: (1) administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 against DDS; and (2) ordinary mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 against both DDS and FDLRC.
DDS now moves for judgment on the pleadings on the s
Hearing Date
August 24, 2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Case Number:
21STCP03501
Hearing Date:
August 24, 2022
Dept:
86
CHATHAM v. BARGMANN,
et al.
Case Number:
21STCP03501
Hearing Date: August 24, 2022
[Tentative]
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
On October 20, 2022, Petitioner, Aaron Chatham, by and through his guardian
ad litem
and conservator, Mary Jane Leonhardi, filed a petition against Respondents, Nancy Bargmann, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) and Los Angeles County Developmental Services Foundation, Inc., d/b/a Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center (FDLRC). FDLRC is also named as a Real Party in Interest. The petition sets forth two causes of action: (1) administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 against DDS; and (2) ordinary mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 against both DDS and FDLRC.
DDS now moves for judgment on the pleadings on the s