20STCV03405 Angel Mercado a minor, by and through her Guardian ad litem, Olivia Jaramillo v. Santos Beltran, et al.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED.
This action arises from an incident that occurred on 7/6/18. Plaintiff alleges that a vehicle operated by Defendant Santos Anabelis Beltran struck Plaintiff while she was crossing the street. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Mario Beltran was the legal owner of the vehicle and allegedly entrusted the vehicle to Defendant Santos. Complaint ¶ 3. Plaintiff alleges claims for negligence, negligence per se, and negligent entrustment. Plaintiff seeks leave to amend the complaint to add a claim for permissive liability based against M. Beltran.
Leave to amend is permitted at the court’s discretion upon any terms that may be just. (Code Civ Procedure § 473.) The statute is liberally construed to permit amendment of the pleadings. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 760.) If the mot
Hearing Date
February 09, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
20STCV03405 Angel Mercado a minor, by and through her Guardian ad litem, Olivia Jaramillo v. Santos Beltran, et al.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED.
This action arises from an incident that occurred on 7/6/18. Plaintiff alleges that a vehicle operated by Defendant Santos Anabelis Beltran struck Plaintiff while she was crossing the street. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Mario Beltran was the legal owner of the vehicle and allegedly entrusted the vehicle to Defendant Santos. Complaint ¶ 3. Plaintiff alleges claims for negligence, negligence per se, and negligent entrustment. Plaintiff seeks leave to amend the complaint to add a claim for permissive liability based against M. Beltran.
Leave to amend is permitted at the court’s discretion upon any terms that may be just. (Code Civ Procedure § 473.) The statute is liberally construed to permit amendment of the pleadings. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 760.) If the mot