Case Number:
20SMCV00819
Hearing Date:
October 15, 2021
Dept:
M
CASE NAME:
Tom Yang v. Venice Business Partners, Inc.
CASE NO.:
20SMCV00819
MOTION:
Demurrer to Cross-Complaint
HEARING DATE:
10/15/2021
Background
On January 20, 2021, Venice Business Partners, Inc. (“VBP”) filed a
cross-complaint against Cross-Defendants Tom Yang and Roes 1 -10 for: (1) declaratory relief; (2) conversion; (3) for violation of California’s usury law; (4) for unfair business practices; (5) an accounting; (6) violation of the California Uniform Commercial Code § 9623; (7) violation of the California Uniform Commercial Code §§ 9610-11; and (8) breach of oral agreement.
Legal Standard
“Before filing a demurrer . . . the demurring party shall meet and confer
in person or by telephone
with the party who filed the pleading . . . for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would re
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Case Number:
20SMCV00819
Hearing Date:
October 15, 2021
Dept:
M
CASE NAME:
Tom Yang v. Venice Business Partners, Inc.
CASE NO.:
20SMCV00819
MOTION:
Demurrer to Cross-Complaint
HEARING DATE:
10/15/2021
Background
On January 20, 2021, Venice Business Partners, Inc. (“VBP”) filed a
cross-complaint against Cross-Defendants Tom Yang and Roes 1 -10 for: (1) declaratory relief; (2) conversion; (3) for violation of California’s usury law; (4) for unfair business practices; (5) an accounting; (6) violation of the California Uniform Commercial Code § 9623; (7) violation of the California Uniform Commercial Code §§ 9610-11; and (8) breach of oral agreement.
Legal Standard
“Before filing a demurrer . . . the demurring party shall meet and confer
in person or by telephone
with the party who filed the pleading . . . for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would re