Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
(Subscribe to View) Track This Case
December 31, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
26
Civil
Other Civil Petition (Limited Jurisdiction)
Pending
Respondent: ATM PROFESSIONAL INC.
Respondent: ZARGAR MICHAEL
Petitioner: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION
Attorney for Petitioner: FABIAN SARAH LYNN
Feb 24, 2021
California Department of Tax and Fee Administration v. ATM Professional, Inc., et al PETITION FOR HEARING ON THIRD PARTY CLAIM (CCP § 720.310) TENTATIVE RULING: Following the hearing on Petitioner California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s Petition for Hearing on Third Party Claim, the Court finds Claimants ATM Professional, Inc. and Michael Zargar have not demonstrated the validity of their claim. Petitioner to file proposed order within ten (10) days’ service of this order. ANALYSIS: Petitioner California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (“Petitioner’) filed the instant Petition for Determination of Third Party Claim on August 27, 2020 against Respondents ATM Professional, Inc. and Michael Zargar (“Claimants”). On October 2, 2020, Petitioner filed Notice of Hearing and Proof of Service. On October 29, 2020, Petitioner filed a Notice of Acknowledgment of Receipt. ........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION VS ATM PROFESSIONAL, INC., ET AL.
Case No.: 20STCP02749