SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF VENTURA
Tentative Ruling
202200571136CUPO: Mary Markley vs. City of Oxnard
06/24/2024 in Department 42
Motion for Summary Judgment for Defendant Brightview Landscape Services
Motion for summary judgment is denied.
The City of Oxnard has standing to oppose this motion, because if it were granted,
The4 City could not argue or produce evidence at trial of Brightview’s negligence per CCP
473c(1).
As to the motion itself, all of Brightview’s UMF’s are undisputed, except for UMF
10 which is based on a photograph which is not before the Court. The rest of the evidence
does not support the offer of what the photo shows. The photo is the best evidence, and
without it, the UMF goes down. The existing condition on the day of the injury remains a
disputed material fact. This includes the contentio
Hearing Date
June 24, 2024
Category
Motion for Summary Judgment for Defendant Brightview Landscape Services
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF VENTURA
Tentative Ruling
202200571136CUPO: Mary Markley vs. City of Oxnard
06/24/2024 in Department 42
Motion for Summary Judgment for Defendant Brightview Landscape Services
Motion for summary judgment is denied.
The City of Oxnard has standing to oppose this motion, because if it were granted,
The4 City could not argue or produce evidence at trial of Brightview’s negligence per CCP
473c(1).
As to the motion itself, all of Brightview’s UMF’s are undisputed, except for UMF
10 which is based on a photograph which is not before the Court. The rest of the evidence
does not support the offer of what the photo shows. The photo is the best evidence, and
without it, the UMF goes down. The existing condition on the day of the injury remains a
disputed material fact. This includes the contentio