CASE NAME: Evan Pierce v. State of California, et al.
CASE NUMBER: 19STCV40106
MOTION: Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (Motion for Reconsideration)
HEARING DATE: 06/01/2021
Legal Standard
A court may reconsider a prior ruling if the party affected provides notice within 10 days of the order it seeks reconsideration of “new or different facts, circumstances, or law.” (Code Civ. Proc. §1008(a).) “[F]acts of which the party seeking reconsideration was aware at the time of the original ruling are not ‘new or different.’” (In re Marriage of Herr (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1463, 1468 [citing Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 690].) “The party making the application shall state by affidavit what application was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed to be shown.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008(a).)
Analysis
On September 17, 2020, the Court denied Jane Kiely Davis’ moti
Hearing Date
June 01, 2021
Type
Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death - Uninsured Motorist (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
CASE NAME: Evan Pierce v. State of California, et al.
CASE NUMBER: 19STCV40106
MOTION: Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (Motion for Reconsideration)
HEARING DATE: 06/01/2021
Legal Standard
A court may reconsider a prior ruling if the party affected provides notice within 10 days of the order it seeks reconsideration of “new or different facts, circumstances, or law.” (Code Civ. Proc. §1008(a).) “[F]acts of which the party seeking reconsideration was aware at the time of the original ruling are not ‘new or different.’” (In re Marriage of Herr (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1463, 1468 [citing Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 690].) “The party making the application shall state by affidavit what application was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed to be shown.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008(a).)
Analysis
On September 17, 2020, the Court denied Jane Kiely Davis’ moti