TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 7
Date: 10/23/2020
Case No: 19 GDCV00360 Trial Date: None Set
Case Name: FCMT, Inc. v. Dot Dot Smile, LLC
APPLICATION TO RELEASE ATTACHED PROPERTY, INCREASE UNDERTAKING AND REDUCE AMOUNT SECURED BY ATTACHMENT
Moving Party: Defendant Dot Dot Smile, LLC
Responding Party: Plaintiff FCMT, Inc.
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Release Attached Property Exceeding in Value the Amount to be Secured, Increase Plaintiff’s Undertaking, Reduce Amount to be Secured by Attachment
SUMMARY OF FACTS:
Plaintiff FCMT, Inc. alleges that defendant Dot Dot Smile, LLC placed garment orders with plaintiff for the delivery of various children’s clothing, that the garments were shipped to defendant, and that defendant has failed to fully pay for the shipments as agreed.
Defendant Dot Dot Smile has filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff FCMT, and its principal, Norman Gu, as cross-defendant, alleging that cross-defendants represented to Dot Dot Smile that they had the requisite skill,
Hearing Date
October 23, 2020
Type
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 7
Date: 10/23/2020
Case No: 19 GDCV00360 Trial Date: None Set
Case Name: FCMT, Inc. v. Dot Dot Smile, LLC
APPLICATION TO RELEASE ATTACHED PROPERTY, INCREASE UNDERTAKING AND REDUCE AMOUNT SECURED BY ATTACHMENT
Moving Party: Defendant Dot Dot Smile, LLC
Responding Party: Plaintiff FCMT, Inc.
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Release Attached Property Exceeding in Value the Amount to be Secured, Increase Plaintiff’s Undertaking, Reduce Amount to be Secured by Attachment
SUMMARY OF FACTS:
Plaintiff FCMT, Inc. alleges that defendant Dot Dot Smile, LLC placed garment orders with plaintiff for the delivery of various children’s clothing, that the garments were shipped to defendant, and that defendant has failed to fully pay for the shipments as agreed.
Defendant Dot Dot Smile has filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff FCMT, and its principal, Norman Gu, as cross-defendant, alleging that cross-defendants represented to Dot Dot Smile that they had the requisite skill,