SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
MARISSA D’ONOFRIO, etc., Plaintiff, vs. NANCY COLLET, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: 19STCV12101
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE
Date: August 1, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
MOVING PARTIES: Defendants Nancy Collet, Christophe Collet, and Collet Real Estate, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Marissa D’Onofrio
The Court has considered the moving and opposition papers. No reply papers were filed.
BACKGROUND
This is an action arising from alleged uninhabitable conditions that a tenant was subjected in connection with her tenancy at 1222 Stearns Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90035 (the “Property”). Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging causes of action for: (1) breach of the implied warranty of habitability; (2) negligence; (3) nuisance; and (4) breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment.
Defendants filed a motion to strike references to punitive damages from the complaint on the grounds t
Hearing Date
August 01, 2019
Type
Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
MARISSA D’ONOFRIO, etc., Plaintiff, vs. NANCY COLLET, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: 19STCV12101
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE
Date: August 1, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
MOVING PARTIES: Defendants Nancy Collet, Christophe Collet, and Collet Real Estate, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Marissa D’Onofrio
The Court has considered the moving and opposition papers. No reply papers were filed.
BACKGROUND
This is an action arising from alleged uninhabitable conditions that a tenant was subjected in connection with her tenancy at 1222 Stearns Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90035 (the “Property”). Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging causes of action for: (1) breach of the implied warranty of habitability; (2) negligence; (3) nuisance; and (4) breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment.
Defendants filed a motion to strike references to punitive damages from the complaint on the grounds t