8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
11 TEVITA TUIFUA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 13 OF LABOR CODE SECTION 2698, ET vs. SEQ., PRIVATE ATTORNEYS 14 GENERAL ACT OF 2004 CLAIMS FS PALO ALTO EMPLOYMENT, INC., Does
15 1-50, inclusive,
16 Defendants.
21 I. INTRODUCTION
22 Plaintiff Tevita Tuifua (“Plaintiff”) filed this case as a putative class action, alleging 23 various wage and hour violations. The Complaint sets forth the following causes of action: 24 (2) 3 Violation of California Labor Code Section 226; (3) Unlawful, Unfair, and Fraudulent 25 Business Practices Pursuant to Business & Professions Code Section 17200, et seq.; and 26 (4) Private Attorneys General Act of 2004: Labor Code Section 2698. 27
There does not appear to be a first cause of action in the Complaint.
1 On September 21, 2018, the court granted the motion by defendant FS Palo Alto 2 Employment, Inc. (“Defendant”) to compel Plai
Hearing Date
August 21, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
11 TEVITA TUIFUA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 13 OF LABOR CODE SECTION 2698, ET vs. SEQ., PRIVATE ATTORNEYS 14 GENERAL ACT OF 2004 CLAIMS FS PALO ALTO EMPLOYMENT, INC., Does
15 1-50, inclusive,
16 Defendants.
21 I. INTRODUCTION
22 Plaintiff Tevita Tuifua (“Plaintiff”) filed this case as a putative class action, alleging 23 various wage and hour violations. The Complaint sets forth the following causes of action: 24 (2) 3 Violation of California Labor Code Section 226; (3) Unlawful, Unfair, and Fraudulent 25 Business Practices Pursuant to Business & Professions Code Section 17200, et seq.; and 26 (4) Private Attorneys General Act of 2004: Labor Code Section 2698. 27
There does not appear to be a first cause of action in the Complaint.
1 On September 21, 2018, the court granted the motion by defendant FS Palo Alto 2 Employment, Inc. (“Defendant”) to compel Plai