On August 05, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hoffman, Diane,
and
City Of Chino,
City Of San Bernardino,
County Of San Bernardino,
Does 1 Through 100,
San Bernardino County,
State Of California,
for Property Damage Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
LED
SUPE"|(": {C'fi'flz ‘T
Cn'CALIFOY NU“
coumvc 4?“?
'~'.N.”-E:‘
,
SAN BERNARS'NO DIST'”
sUPEmon COURT
.-7“ D n"
A 5’ n u u 2721.
CQUNTY 0F SAN samanmo
247 West Third Street. Departmon‘.
s-n Bomardino. California 92415
V
AME p nacyo’ j:350w
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
~
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
'
F \
\AQCANRWW’ x
,
I\
LO(‘< b
I
,
,
V (
Praintifi Case No; Q,\\3 {JQ‘XCA
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
1O CONFERENCE
1‘1
Cuv \ \
\‘\ I O\( v» W >
G‘flf‘xwd LA (k
'
W,
12
Vg
13 Defendant
14
THE COURT'ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
15
Prior to any party filing any discovery motioh in this action.the moving party must
18
schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference. with allparties and the Court.
;
Fallure'
17
fof the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with
this order.
1B
The purpose of the discovery conference is to tryand resolve the discovery issues without the
19
necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the dlscovery dispute
will be dlscussed
20
:as wellas potential referral of the case out to JudicialReference (JR) pursuant to code.
21
Referral to JR isrelatively rare but nonetheless, is-a. pOSSibility after
this'conference. The time
22‘
for bringing any discovery motion ifnecessary, willbe tolledby any delay caused by the
23
telephonic conference.
24 '
Failure to obe/yhthis0rd? will result Sanctions.
25
Dated this ‘3’)
day gt .20;)
k
.
,
-udg_e'\n’n_._rT<_LrfiberIin
27
28
ORDER
.1-
Document Filed Date
April 08, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 05, 2020
Category
Property Damage Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
LED SUPE"|(": {C'fi'flz ‘T Cn'CALIFOY NU“ coumvc 4?“? '~'.N.”-E:‘ , SAN BERNARS'NO DIST'” sUPEmon COURT .-7“ D n" A 5’ n u u 2721. CQUNTY 0F SAN samanmo 247 West Third Street. Departmon‘. s-n Bomardino. California 92415 V AME p nacyo’ j:350w IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ' F \ \AQCANRWW’ x , I\ LO(‘< b I , , V ( Praintifi Case No; Q,\\3 {JQ‘XCA ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 1O CONFERENCE 1‘1 Cuv \ \ \‘\ I O\( v» W > G‘flf‘xwd LA (k ' W, 12 Vg 13 Defendant 14 THE COURT'ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 15 Prior to any party filing any discovery motioh in this action.the moving party must 18 schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference. with allparties and the Court. ; Fallure' 17 fof the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order. 1B The purpose of the discovery conference is to tryand resolve the discovery issues without the 19 necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the dlscovery dispute will be dlscussed 20 :as wellas potential referral of the case out to JudicialReference (JR) pursuant to code. 21 Referral to JR isrelatively rare but nonetheless, is-a. pOSSibility after this'conference. The time 22‘ for bringing any discovery motion ifnecessary, willbe tolledby any delay caused by the 23 telephonic conference. 24 ' Failure to obe/yhthis0rd? will result Sanctions. 25 Dated this ‘3’) day gt .20;) k . , -udg_e'\n’n_._rT<_LrfiberIin 27 28 ORDER .1-