Motion,Ex Parte: TAYLOR-V-CRACKER BARREL Print

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                While   the terms     of the  proposed     settlement appear to         be  generally fair and      the
                  proposed     deductions from       the   gross   settlement    amount appear to         be  reasonable      and
                  appropriate,     counsel    must explain      how the    settlement can      go forward     when     nine  of the
                  settling  parties   are   not subject to the     court’s jurisdiction     and   would   not Emgmfifi logs
                  judicata.                                                                                      QSZUNTY OCFOUHT CPD
                                                                                                                    N
                                                                                                                      BERNAg’gxIBEng/EORN,A
                           (The   recoverable      costs  are   $14,291 .51,    although    there   appears to      bngg      rroor?(?Tmc’yo

                  the  papers    at  p. 12,  line  27, where     only  $13,809.28      is listed.  The   Bapers    prop       1
                                                                                                                                 202/
                                                                                                           Y
                  documentthe        full $14,291.51      elsewhere.)




                                                                                                                   ’
                   10.     Taylor   v. Cracker     Barrel   Old  Country    Store,   Inc.  et al.
                           ClVDS-2009214           (Including   consolidated      case   CIVDS-201322’0’)»;


                           Motion    for Approval     of  PAGA Settlement

                           Tentative    Ruling:


                           Grant with     modifications.      The   attorney fee    is reduced     to‘g33.33%    of the   gross.
                  The   requested     35%    fee  is notjustified:     The   costs   are'reduced      by  $19.89,   deleting    the
                  charges for Westlaw         and   “Executive     Conferencing.”


                           Counsel     should    explain   the  chargéw’of $1 ,2040      to  Fountain    Consulting,     Inc.


                           Counsel     should    provide the     total number     of pay-periods      in the  PAGA      period.




                   11.      Ortiz,  Trujilld VAPL      Logistics Warehouse
                                                         V
                                                                                    Services
                            CIVD§5§1928357                  I
                                                             ,




                            Motio‘hTor    Preliminary Approval         of Class Action     and   PAGA Settlement
                           ,Tehtativfie‘r Ruling:


                            Gréntfiand     schédulei‘for    final approval    hearing,    subject to    additional   information:


                            1.  The   total  number     of work-weeks       in the  class   period.
                            2.  The   inclusive   dates   of the   PAGA     period.




                                                                                                                          Page   2 of 3