On October 28, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wells Fargo Bank N.A,
and
Shadle, Maralee,
for Unlimited Collections
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
UPER,
COUR
Oj KOC la
San
SERN ONG ALIFOR
RO" INIA
SUPERIOR COURT ay
i
RIC
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO:
ay ‘ae ‘294
247 West Third Street, Departmen,
San Bemardino, California 92415
ORLm
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
WUsLan
Plaintiff ‘\e be Case No: CHS Ad 2A
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
10 CONFERENCE
1
12
Sydle
43 Defendant
14
THE COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
18
Prior to any party filing any discovery motion in this action, the moving party must
16
schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference with all parties and the Court. Failure| I
17
for the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order.
18
The purpose of the discovery conference is to try and resolve the discovery issues without the
19
necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute will be discussed
20
as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code.
21
Referral to JR is relatively rare but nonetheless, is a possibility after this conference. The time
22
for bringing any discovery motion if necessary, will be tolled by any delay caused by the
23
telephonic conference.
.\
24
Failure to ol this Order will result in Sanctions.
26
Dated this — day of 2
<4
judge M. Tomberlin
27
RP COTE AF
ORDER
A
Document Filed Date
May 04, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 28, 2020
Category
Unlimited Collections
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
UPER, COUR Oj KOC la San SERN ONG ALIFOR RO" INIA SUPERIOR COURT ay i RIC COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO: ay ‘ae ‘294 247 West Third Street, Departmen, San Bemardino, California 92415 ORLm IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO WUsLan Plaintiff ‘\e be Case No: CHS Ad 2A ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 10 CONFERENCE 1 12 Sydle 43 Defendant 14 THE COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 18 Prior to any party filing any discovery motion in this action, the moving party must 16 schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference with all parties and the Court. Failure| I 17 for the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order. 18 The purpose of the discovery conference is to try and resolve the discovery issues without the 19 necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute will be discussed 20 as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code. 21 Referral to JR is relatively rare but nonetheless, is a possibility after this conference. The time 22 for bringing any discovery motion if necessary, will be tolled by any delay caused by the 23 telephonic conference. .\ 24 Failure to ol this Order will result in Sanctions. 26 Dated this — day of 2 <4 judge M. Tomberlin 27 RP COTE AF ORDER A