On February 10, 2021 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Seeley, Brian,
Seeley, Norene,
and
Calderon Cruz, Arturo Edwardo,
Does 1 Through 50,
Hylkema Roofing Company,
Hylkema Roofing Company, Inc,
for Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
C I n. ..
“91%;; ?cr‘ L:
V)” '1. "-"F(R
w mew? MA
~..
JUL?”
’,.
f)
summon count
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
55,9 L9L. 7m ,.
L 1-"!
I
247 West Third Departmen.
Street,
‘San Bemardlno, Callfornla 92415
SY ,r»
4 ""‘Vu.,‘g
AMjEA‘v
-
r334dum le
I
.T/
’
A
‘"
P
~.~
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
(71%»
Pliaintifi ca”. N°= CA“ S g Q \O SVVGN
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
10 CONFERENCE
1'1
12
'13
d
Defendant
MM
14
THE COURT‘ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
15
Prior to any party filing any- discovery motioh in this action.the moving patty must
16
schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference. with allparties and the Court. Failure
17
the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this
foi'
order.
1B
The purpose of the discovery conference is to tryand resolve the discovery issues without the
19
necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute willbe discussed
2D
'as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code.
21
Referral to .JR isrelatively rare but nonetheless, is-a‘possibility after this'conference. The time
22 ‘
for bringing any discovery motion ifnecessary. willbe tolled by any delay caused by the
23
telephonic conference.
24
Failure toobey this Order will result In Sanctions.
25
Dated thisajday of_fl_ 2134
26
27
28
ORDER
-1-
Document Filed Date
September 24, 2021
Case Filing Date
February 10, 2021
Category
Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
C I n. .. “91%;; ?cr‘ L: V)” '1. "-"F(R w mew? MA ~.. JUL?” ’,. f) summon count COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 55,9 L9L. 7m ,. L 1-"! I 247 West Third Departmen. Street, ‘San Bemardlno, Callfornla 92415 SY ,r» 4 ""‘Vu.,‘g AMjEA‘v - r334dum le I .T/ ’ A ‘" P ~.~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO (71%» Pliaintifi ca”. N°= CA“ S g Q \O SVVGN ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 10 CONFERENCE 1'1 12 '13 d Defendant MM 14 THE COURT‘ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 15 Prior to any party filing any- discovery motioh in this action.the moving patty must 16 schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference. with allparties and the Court. Failure 17 the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this foi' order. 1B The purpose of the discovery conference is to tryand resolve the discovery issues without the 19 necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute willbe discussed 2D 'as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code. 21 Referral to .JR isrelatively rare but nonetheless, is-a‘possibility after this'conference. The time 22 ‘ for bringing any discovery motion ifnecessary. willbe tolled by any delay caused by the 23 telephonic conference. 24 Failure toobey this Order will result In Sanctions. 25 Dated thisajday of_fl_ 2134 26 27 28 ORDER -1-