On June 02, 2021 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mesquita, Nora,
and
Contractor'S Wardrobe, Inc.,
Does 1 Through 10,
Sepulveda, Eduardo,
Wardrobe Company, Inc.,
for Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
SUPENmr‘CglkTfiL‘.
CQUWY f?!
ELIFORMA
Nfl'fi'
E! \l
lf‘."
SAN HBRN war?!” a'uusm
cr
SUPERIOR COURT
V
a ,.
D E; C Z O 2021
comm! 0F 3m asamnnmo
247 West Third Depanmen.
Street.
‘San Bemardlno, California 92415 BY
'A'MIE
mama: a 2!
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINC
6110\ \/\
@l S&Ifi
P111? Case No£/\\JS
\
V
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
1o CONFERENCE
“€0va i
1'1
0Q ”\
12
'13 Defendant
14
THE COURT‘ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
15
Prior to any party filing any. discovery motioh in this action,the moving party must
1s
.schedule and complete a tplephonic discovery conference with allparties and the Court. Failure“!
17
fo'r
the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply
with this order.
18
The purpose of the discovery conference isto try and resolve the discovery issues without the
19
necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute willbe discussed
20
as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to
code.
21
Referral to JR ls relativelyrare but nonetheless, is-a_possibility after tHis'conference. The time
22,
for bringing any discovery motion necessary, be
if will tolled by any delay caused by the
23
telephonic conference.
24
Failure too ey this Order will result In Sanctions.
25
26
Dated this
b daygjiw ,2
27
28
fixW
By. o - l,
.
ORDER
-1-
Document Filed Date
December 10, 2021
Case Filing Date
June 02, 2021
Category
Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPENmr‘CglkTfiL‘. CQUWY f?! ELIFORMA Nfl'fi' E! \l lf‘." SAN HBRN war?!” a'uusm cr SUPERIOR COURT V a ,. D E; C Z O 2021 comm! 0F 3m asamnnmo 247 West Third Depanmen. Street. ‘San Bemardlno, California 92415 BY 'A'MIE mama: a 2! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINC 6110\ \/\ @l S&Ifi P111? Case No£/\\JS \ V ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 1o CONFERENCE “€0va i 1'1 0Q ”\ 12 '13 Defendant 14 THE COURT‘ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 15 Prior to any party filing any. discovery motioh in this action,the moving party must 1s .schedule and complete a tplephonic discovery conference with allparties and the Court. Failure“! 17 fo'r the opposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order. 18 The purpose of the discovery conference isto try and resolve the discovery issues without the 19 necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute willbe discussed 20 as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code. 21 Referral to JR ls relativelyrare but nonetheless, is-a_possibility after tHis'conference. The time 22, for bringing any discovery motion necessary, be if will tolled by any delay caused by the 23 telephonic conference. 24 Failure too ey this Order will result In Sanctions. 25 26 Dated this b daygjiw ,2 27 28 fixW By. o - l, . ORDER -1-