On March 04, 2021 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Aiello, Enrico,
Strada Wheels Inc,
and
Does 1 Through 20,
Envision Capital Group Llc,
for Fraud Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
,.
'6'”
?“-’a'i
bl. Li???
SUPERIOR COURT
CQUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO , P
BY "4413,va
247 West Third Sheet, Departmen.
1;
:3 {91 v
3M)
'San Bemardlno, Camomla 92415 AMiE ARROYO, EEF’UTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
(Ax dub
Pliaintiff 035°. N°= uvsb Q\ OWSCH
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
10 CONFERENCE
1’1
12
{ywi $\M
13 Defendant
14
THE COURT'ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
15
Prior toany party filingany discovery motiori in this action. themoving party must
16
.schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference with all parties and the Court. Failure
17
fdr theopposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with
this order.
18
The purpose of the discovery conference isto tryand resolve the discovery issues without the
19
necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute
willbe discussed
20
'as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to
code.
21
Referral to JR is relatively rare but nonetheless, is‘
a‘possibility after this'conference. The time
22 '
for bringing any discovery motion necessary, be
if will tolled by any delay caused by the
23
telephonic conference.
24
Failure to obe this Order will result in Sanctions.
25
26
j. day ofi. 2°
udgg M. Toniberlin
27
28
ORDER
-1-
Document Filed Date
September 07, 2021
Case Filing Date
March 04, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
,. '6'” ?“-’a'i bl. Li??? SUPERIOR COURT CQUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO , P BY "4413,va 247 West Third Sheet, Departmen. 1; :3 {91 v 3M) 'San Bemardlno, Camomla 92415 AMiE ARROYO, EEF’UTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO (Ax dub Pliaintiff 035°. N°= uvsb Q\ OWSCH ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 10 CONFERENCE 1’1 12 {ywi $\M 13 Defendant 14 THE COURT'ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 15 Prior toany party filingany discovery motiori in this action. themoving party must 16 .schedule and complete a telephonic discovery conference with all parties and the Court. Failure 17 fdr theopposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order. 18 The purpose of the discovery conference isto tryand resolve the discovery issues without the 19 necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute willbe discussed 20 'as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code. 21 Referral to JR is relatively rare but nonetheless, is‘ a‘possibility after this'conference. The time 22 ' for bringing any discovery motion necessary, be if will tolled by any delay caused by the 23 telephonic conference. 24 Failure to obe this Order will result in Sanctions. 25 26 j. day ofi. 2° udgg M. Toniberlin 27 28 ORDER -1-