On May 24, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company,
and
Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc.,
for Commercial - Contract
in the District Court of Kings County.
Preview
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/15/2019 05:08 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Index No.: 510798/2018
Plaintiff,
Hon. Carl J. Landicino, J.S.C.
v.
AFFIRMATION IN REPLY TO
EASTERN FRUIT & VEGETABLES INC. DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION
REGARDING MOTION TO
Defendant. DISMISS AND/OR REARGUE
Debra M. Krebs, Esq. an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York,
affirms the following under the penalty of perjury:
1. I am a partner at the law firm of Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP, attorneys
for Plaintiff, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company (“Atlantic Casualty”). As such, and based
upon my review of this file, I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth herein.
2. I submit this affirmation in further support of Atlantic Casualty’s motion seeking
an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR 3211(b) dismissing or striking Defendant’s Sixth Affirmative
Defense; and/or (2) pursuant to CPLR 2221 granting reargument of the Court’s order dated July 2,
2019 and, upon reargument, amending the order to find that Atlantic Casualty does, in fact, have
the capacity to maintain this lawsuit. More specifically, this affirmation is submitted in reply to
Defendant’s opposition
3. As discussed more fully in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, the question
of whether the excess/surplus lines broker complied with the requirements of the Insurance Law
and/or Article 41 is irrelevant to a determination as to whether Atlantic Casualty has the capacity
to bring this lawsuit. Among other things, any alleged violation by the broker is not attributable
1
1 of 2
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/15/2019 05:08 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2019
to Atlantic Casualty and would have no impact on the validity of the insurance policy or upon the
question of whether Atlantic Casualty “does business” in New York.
4. Nonetheless, to satisfy any potential curiosity on the issue, attached are copies of
the surplus lines affidavits relating to the insurance policies at issue in this lawsuit. In particular,
the affidavit relating to policy L146001424-1 (for the 2016-2017 policy period) is attached as
Exhibit A and a copy of the affidavit relating to policy L146001424-2 (for the 2017-2018 policy
period) is attached as Exhibit B.
WHEREFORE, Atlantic Casualty respectfully requests an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR
3211(b) dismissing or striking Defendant’s Sixth Affirmative Defense; and/or (2) pursuant to
CPLR 2221 granting reargument of the Court’s order dated July 2, 2019 and, upon reargument,
amending the order to find that Atlantic Casualty does, in fact, have the capacity to maintain this
lawsuit and/or (3) granting Atlantic Casualty such other and further relief as to this Court seems
just and proper.
Dated: October 15, 2019
White Plains, New York
By: ________________________________
Debra M. Krebs, Esq.
2
2 of 2
Document Filed Date
October 15, 2019
Case Filing Date
May 24, 2018
Category
Commercial - Contract
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.