arrow left
arrow right
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/15/2019 05:08 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Index No.: 510798/2018 Plaintiff, Hon. Carl J. Landicino, J.S.C. v. AFFIRMATION IN REPLY TO EASTERN FRUIT & VEGETABLES INC. DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION REGARDING MOTION TO Defendant. DISMISS AND/OR REARGUE Debra M. Krebs, Esq. an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York, affirms the following under the penalty of perjury: 1. I am a partner at the law firm of Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP, attorneys for Plaintiff, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company (“Atlantic Casualty”). As such, and based upon my review of this file, I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth herein. 2. I submit this affirmation in further support of Atlantic Casualty’s motion seeking an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR 3211(b) dismissing or striking Defendant’s Sixth Affirmative Defense; and/or (2) pursuant to CPLR 2221 granting reargument of the Court’s order dated July 2, 2019 and, upon reargument, amending the order to find that Atlantic Casualty does, in fact, have the capacity to maintain this lawsuit. More specifically, this affirmation is submitted in reply to Defendant’s opposition 3. As discussed more fully in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, the question of whether the excess/surplus lines broker complied with the requirements of the Insurance Law and/or Article 41 is irrelevant to a determination as to whether Atlantic Casualty has the capacity to bring this lawsuit. Among other things, any alleged violation by the broker is not attributable 1 1 of 2 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/15/2019 05:08 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2019 to Atlantic Casualty and would have no impact on the validity of the insurance policy or upon the question of whether Atlantic Casualty “does business” in New York. 4. Nonetheless, to satisfy any potential curiosity on the issue, attached are copies of the surplus lines affidavits relating to the insurance policies at issue in this lawsuit. In particular, the affidavit relating to policy L146001424-1 (for the 2016-2017 policy period) is attached as Exhibit A and a copy of the affidavit relating to policy L146001424-2 (for the 2017-2018 policy period) is attached as Exhibit B. WHEREFORE, Atlantic Casualty respectfully requests an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR 3211(b) dismissing or striking Defendant’s Sixth Affirmative Defense; and/or (2) pursuant to CPLR 2221 granting reargument of the Court’s order dated July 2, 2019 and, upon reargument, amending the order to find that Atlantic Casualty does, in fact, have the capacity to maintain this lawsuit and/or (3) granting Atlantic Casualty such other and further relief as to this Court seems just and proper. Dated: October 15, 2019 White Plains, New York By: ________________________________ Debra M. Krebs, Esq. 2 2 of 2