arrow left
arrow right
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Michelle S. Carter, Aron Rovner Md, Pllc, Brook Chiropractic Of Ny P.C., Citimedical I, Pllc, Dignity Pt, P.C., Frank Sauchelli, M.D., Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C., Jules F. Parisien, July Pt, P.C., Lefferts Gardens Chiropractic P.C., Life Rehab Pt, P.C., Longevity Medical Supply, Inc., Nyc Community Medical Care P.C., Quantum Rehab, Physical Therapy, P.C., Yjr Acupuncture P.C. Commercial - Insurance document preview
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Michelle S. Carter, Aron Rovner Md, Pllc, Brook Chiropractic Of Ny P.C., Citimedical I, Pllc, Dignity Pt, P.C., Frank Sauchelli, M.D., Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C., Jules F. Parisien, July Pt, P.C., Lefferts Gardens Chiropractic P.C., Life Rehab Pt, P.C., Longevity Medical Supply, Inc., Nyc Community Medical Care P.C., Quantum Rehab, Physical Therapy, P.C., Yjr Acupuncture P.C. Commercial - Insurance document preview
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Michelle S. Carter, Aron Rovner Md, Pllc, Brook Chiropractic Of Ny P.C., Citimedical I, Pllc, Dignity Pt, P.C., Frank Sauchelli, M.D., Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C., Jules F. Parisien, July Pt, P.C., Lefferts Gardens Chiropractic P.C., Life Rehab Pt, P.C., Longevity Medical Supply, Inc., Nyc Community Medical Care P.C., Quantum Rehab, Physical Therapy, P.C., Yjr Acupuncture P.C. Commercial - Insurance document preview
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Michelle S. Carter, Aron Rovner Md, Pllc, Brook Chiropractic Of Ny P.C., Citimedical I, Pllc, Dignity Pt, P.C., Frank Sauchelli, M.D., Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C., Jules F. Parisien, July Pt, P.C., Lefferts Gardens Chiropractic P.C., Life Rehab Pt, P.C., Longevity Medical Supply, Inc., Nyc Community Medical Care P.C., Quantum Rehab, Physical Therapy, P.C., Yjr Acupuncture P.C. Commercial - Insurance document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________________ LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. PLAINTIFF, INDEX NO.: 652670/18 -AGAINST- FILE NO.: GS- 723583 MICHELLE CARTER And DEFENDANT's ARON ROVNER MD PLLC FIRST SET OF DEMAND FOR BROOK CHIROPRACTIC OF NY PC CITMEDICAL PLLC VERIFIED WRITTEN I, DIGNITY PT, PC, INTERROGATORIES FRANK SAUCHELLI MD, GENTLE CARE ACUPUNCTURE, PC JULES PARISEN, JULY PT, PC LEFFERTS GARDENS CHIROPRACTIC PC LIFE REHAB PT PC LONGEVITY MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC, NYC COMMUNITY MEDICAL CARE PC, QUANTUM REHAB PHYSICAL THERAPY PC, YJR ACUPUNCTURE PC DEFENDANTS. _______________-________________________________________ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendant YJR ACUPUNCTURE PC hereby demands that the Plaintiff serve upon the undersigned within twenty (20) days from the date of service herein, a copy of answers to each interrogatory pursuant to §3101, §3130, §3131, and RULE 3133 of the Civil Practice Laws and Rules of the State of New York. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS CPLR R. 3133 (b) provides "Interrogatories shall be answered in writing, under oath by the party served, if an individual, or, ifthe party served is a corporation, a partnership or a sole proprietorship, by an officer, director, member, agent or employee having the information. Each question shall be answered separately and fully, and each answer shall be preceded by the responds." question to which it PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that any documents provided in response to this demand must be separately identified by an Exhibit Number or Question number, and must be annexed to the PlaintifF s response. 1 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 DEFINITIONS 1) Assignor(s): shall refer to MICHELLE CARTER and at time referred as Plaintiff's insured. 2) "Defendant": shall refer to YJR ACUPUNCTURE PC and shall at times be referred to as assignee. "Plaintiff" 3) shall mean LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, owners, directors, trustees, offices, employees, agents and counsel or third party administrators. Plaintiff" 4) shall mean LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and any of itsagents or representatives. 5) "Received": shall mean to come into possession and/or control, or to take custody of. "Bill" 6) or "Bills": shall mean any document requesting payment for dates of service and services rendered; or shall also mean any document otherwise known as "NF-3", Health Insurance Claim Form (HICF). "Document" 7) shall mean writings, exhibits, NF-3(s), Assignment of benefit(s), medical bills, reports, Health Insurance Claim Form(s) (HICF), emails, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phone records, and other date compilations, including electronic or computerized data compilations, from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, through detection devices into reasonable usable form. "Copy" 8) or "Copies": shall mean a reproduction, replication, duplicate, or imitation of a document; or shall mean a document that looks like, and/or appears similar to the documents annexed hereto. like" 9) "Looks and "appears similar": shall mean with respect to bill(s) that the document has the same assignor's name, same date of services, same procedure codes and the same amount of money demanded. 10) "Paid": shall mean any satisfaction, remuneration and/or compensation in monetary form. 11) "Assignment of Benefits": shall mean any document that appears to transfer to another allor part of one's property, interest, or rights. 12) "Verification": shall mean any document sent by Plaintiff to plaintiff seeking additional information from plaintiff, including, but not limited to any requests for verification in 2 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 the form of a request for an examination under oath of the assignor(s) and/or assignee, requests for further information pertaining to assignee's proofs of claims, including NF-3 bill, assignment of benefits, letters of medical necessity, reports, signatures, etc. 13) "NF-10 and/or Denial of Claim Form": shall mean any document that has been prescribed and/or approved by the Department of Insurance, pursuant to 11 NYCRR 65, that is designed and/or intended to be used by Plaintiff to inform plaintiff that the bills submitted in the above-captioned claimed have been denied. "Claim" 14) shall mean any documents that Plaintiff received from Defendant concerning No-Fault benefits which are the subject matter of this lawsuit. 15) The use of the singular form of any word includes the plural and vice versa. INTERROGATORIES 1) INTERROGATORY (1): For Each Claim: a) Set forth the full name, title, and relationship to the Plaintiff of the person answering these interrogatories. b) Set forth whether the person answering these interrogatories is the Plaintiff's claim representative assigned to the bill(s) that are the subject of this lawsuit. c) If the answer to subdivision (b) of this interrogatory is in the negative, set forth the name of the Plaintiff's claim representative assigned to the bill(s) which are the subject of this lawsuit. d) Set forth whether the Plaintiff's claim representative assigned to the bill(s) which are the subject of this lawsuit is currently employed by the Plaintiff. e) Provide any notes, logs, or memoranda prepared or kept by the Plaintiff's claim representative assigned to the bill(s) which are the subject of this lawsuit. 2) INTERROGATORY (2): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether at the time of the motor vehicle accident, which is the subject of this lawsuit, there existed a valid New York Automobile Liability policy issued by the Plaintiff providing No-Fault benefits for the assignor(s) and/or policy holder and/or policy holder herein. b) Set forth the policy number and the dates the policy was in effect. 3) INTERROGATORY 3: For Each Claim: 3 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff received an assignment of benefits from the Plaintiff assignee for services provided to the above-captioned assignor(s), who are the subject of this lawsuit herein. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth a true and accurate copy of the assignment of benefits. 4) INTERROGATORY (4): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff received the bill(s) which are the subject of this lawsuit concerning the assignors in this matter. b) Set forth the date that the bill(s)were received by the Plaintiff. c) Please set forth copies of all billsreceived by the Plaintiff ifthe response in this inquiry is in the affirmative. 5) INTERROGATORY (5): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff made any request for additional verification (including any requests for verification in the form of a request for an examination under oath), of either the assignee and/or assignor(s), concerning any of the bill(s) that are the subject of the lawsuit. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date such request was mailed. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the reason(s) why the requested verification was necessary to process the claim. d) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth a true and accurate copy of such request. e) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether the Plaintiff received any response to its request for additional verification. f) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date the response was received by the Plaintiff. g) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth a true and accurate copy of the response received by the Plaintiff. h) If the Plaintiff has issued a Denial of Claim form (N-F-10) to the plaintiff for the bill(s) that are the subject of this lawsuit, set forth whether the Plaintiff had received allrelevant verification requested prior to the issuance of the N-F-10. 4 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 6) INTERROGATORY (6): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff requested that the assignor(s) and/or the Defendant assignee herein submit to an Examination Under Oath (EUO). b) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of such requests. c) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date any and all examinations were to take place. d) If the answer to any of above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether any assignors and/or Defendant assignee herein were represented by legal counsel. e) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether Plaintiff, Plaintiff's claims representatives, and or Plaintiff's legal counsel had any conversation with the any assigners and/or Defendant assignee and/or its legal representatives. 1) Ifthe answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is inthe affirmative, set forth the dates, names of Plaintiff's employees or representatives that had said communications. 2) If theanswer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is inthe affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of any letters,emails or correspondences. f) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether Plaintiff had any knowledge as to whether the assignors or Defendant assignee had legal representations. g) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether any of the examinations were rescheduled. h) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of any and all communication between. i) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether the examination took place and the date the examination took place. j) If the answer to any of the above subdivisions of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth provide a true and accurate copy of the report and/or transcript from said examination. 7) INTERROGATORY 7: For Each Claim: 5 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 a) Set forth the reason(s) and justification as to why said additional verification requests (including any requests for verification in the form of a request for an examination under oath) were demanded from plaintiff. 8) INTERROGATORY (8): For Each Claim: a) Set forth the name of the individual that made the determination of demanding said requests. 9) INTERROGATORY (9): For Each Claim: a) Set forth the procedures for the generation/creation of the verification requests (Specifically, how are verification requests generated and created, where are the requests generated, what is done with them after they are generated.) b) Set forth the procedures by which the verification requests are mailed to the provider and/or Plaintiff's assignor. c) Set forth the specific objective standard applied by the Plaintiff if an examination under oath was requested of plaintiff and/or plaintiff's assignor (When an insurer requires an examination under oath of an applicant to establish proof of claim, such requirement must be based upon the application of objective standards so that there is specific objective justification supporting the use of such examination. Insurer standards shall be available for review by Department examiners). d) Set forth a true and accurate copy of said objective standards available for review by Department examiners. (65-3.5 (e). e) Set forth whether the Plaintiff writes or has written 1000 insurance policies in the State of New York. f) If the answer to (d) is in the affirmative, please set forth the procedures established by the Plaintiff for handling claims, notices, and verification. (65-3.5 (k). g) If the answer to (d) is in the affirmative, please set forth a written copy of the established procedures for processing claims, notices and verification (65-3.5 (k). 10) INTERROGATORY (10): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff made any payment for the bill(s) that are the subject of this lawsuit, 6 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 b) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the amount of payment and the date such payment was mailed. c) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth copies of any cancelled checks, computer notes, or any other manner that reflects all or partial payments of the bills that are the subject of this lawsuit. I1) INTERROGATORY (11): For Each Claim: Set forth whether the Plaintiff received an Application for Benefits form (N-F- a) 2) from the assignor(s) herein. b) Set forth the date Application for Benefits form (N-F-2) was received by the Plaintiff. c) Set forth a true and accurate copy of the same. d) Set forth whether the Plaintiff's defense to this matter is based upon the allegation that the assignor(s) herein failed to provide written notice to the Plaintiff within the time requirements set forth in 11 NYCRR 65. e) If Plaintiff's defense to this matter is based upon the allegation that the assignor(s) herein failed to provide written notice to the Plaintiff within the time requirements set forth in 11 NYCRR 65, set forth the dates the Plaintiff mailed the Application for Benefits form (N-F-2) to the assignor(s) herein. f) If Plaintiff's defense to this matter is based upon the allegation that the assignors(s) herein failed to provide written notice to the Plaintiff within the time requirements set forth in 11 NYCRR 65, set forth in the address to which the Plaintiff mailed the Application for Benefits form (N-F-2). g) If Plaintiff's defense to this matter is based upon the allegation that the assignor(s) herein failed to provide written notice to the Plaintiff within the time requirements set forth in 11 NYCRR 65, set forth copies of the forms that were mailed to the assignor(s) herein. 12) INTERROGATORY (12): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff issued a Denial of Claim form (N-F-10) to the plaintiff for the bill(s) that are the subject of this lawsuit. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) for this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date the N-F-10 was generated. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date the N-F-10 was mailed, 7 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 d) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the specific address the N-F-10 was mailed from. e) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth with specificity Plaintiff's general business practices pertaining to the mailing procedures of the N-F-10. f) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth a true and accurate copy of the N-F-10. g) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth any proof of mailing, certified receipts or documentation establishing the date the NF-10(s) was/were mailed. h) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the reason(s) that the Plaintiff denied the plaintiff's claim. 13) INTERROGATORY (13): For Each Claim: a) Set forth the procedure on how a Denial of Claim form(s) (N-F-10) was/were created and/or generated by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s), which are the subject of this lawsuit. b) Set forth the procedure on how any verification requests was/were created and/or generated by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s), which are the subject of this lawsuit. c) Set forth the procedure on how any Notice of an Independent Medical Examination Requests was/were created and/or generated by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s), which are the subject of this lawsuit. d) Set forth the procedure on how any Notice of Examination Under Oath requests was/were created and/or generated by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s), which are the subject of this lawsuit. 14) INTERROGATORY (14): For Each Claim: a) Set forth the procedure on how any Denial of Claim form(s) (N-F-10) was/were mailed and/or transported into the care and custody of the United States Postal Office by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s),which are the subject of this lawsuit. b) Set forth the procedure on how any verification requests was/were mailed and/or transported into the care and custody of the United States Postal Office by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s), which are the subject of this lawsuit. 8 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 c) Set forth the procedure on how any Notice of Examination Under Oath requests was/were mailed and/or transported into the care and custody of the United States Postal Office by Plaintiff for the plaintiff for the bill(s), which are the subject of this lawsuit. 15) INTERROGATORY (15): For Each Claim: a) Did Plaintiff use a courier service to mail and/or transport Denial of Claim form(s) (N-F-10), verification requests, Notice of an Independent Medical Examination Requests or Notice of Examination Under Oath requests into the care and custody of the United States Postal Office by Plaintiff during the ordinary course of business. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the specific name of said courier service. 16) INTERROGATORY (16): For Each Claim: a) If the Plaintiff alleges the plaintiff's assignor failed to give timely notice of claim to the Plaintiff, set forth whether the Plaintiff notified plaintiff's assignor that late notice will be excused when the applicant can provided reasonable justification of the failure to give timely notice. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth how the Plaintiff gave such notice. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of such notification. 17) INTERROGATORY (17): For Each Claim: a) If the Plaintiff alleges that plaintiff's assignor failed to give timely proof of claim to the Plaintiff, set forth whether the Plaintiff notified plaintiff's assignor that latenotice will be excused when the applicant can provide reasonable justification of the failure to give timely notice. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth how the Plaintiff gave such notice. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of such notification. 18) INTERROGATORY (18): For Each Claim: a) With respect to the claim(s) sued for under the caption above, set forth whether the Plaintiff requested that the assignor(s) and/or policy holder herein provide a written statement of facts. 9 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 b) With respect to the claim(s) sued for under the caption above, set forth true and accurate copies of such requests. c) With respect to the claim(s) sued for under the caption above, set forth when and where the statements were taken. d) With respect to the claim(s) sued for under the caption above, set forth a true and accurate copy of the written statement. 19) INTERROGATORY (19): For Each Claim: a) With respect to the claim(s) sued for under the caption above, set forth whether the plaintiff's claim was subject to an investigation, or was assigned to a Special Investigation Unit. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the results of said investigation. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate topics of all reports, investigations, notes and memoranda concerning said investigation, including, but not limited to, any SIU reports, EUO transcripts, and/or other investigative reports. 20) INTERROGATORY (20): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff received a copy of MV-104 for the motor vehicle accident which is the subject of this lawsuit. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date the MV-104 was received. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth a true and accurate copy of the MV-104. d) Set forth whether the Plaintiff received a copy of the Police Report for the motor vehicle accident which is the subject of the lawsuit. e) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date the Police Report was received. f) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth a true and accurate copy of the Police Report. 21) INTERROGATORY 21: For Each Claim: 10 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 a) Set forth whether Plaintiff/Insurance Company is claiming that the accident accident." pertaining to the above-entitled case was a "staged b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set accident." forth the basis of claiming that said accident was a result of a "staged c) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of any and all reports, notes, documents, transcripts, videotapes, recordings and memoranda concerning said investigation of any alleged "staged accident", including, but not limited to any SIU reports, investigative reports, and EUO Transcripts. 22) INTERROGATORY (22): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether Plaintiff insurance company is claiming that any of the assignor(s) and/or policy holder committed fraud in this case. b) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the basis and reasons as to why Plaintiff/Insurance Company believes that any of the assignor(s) and/or policy holder committed fraud in this case. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of any and all reports, notes, documents, transcripts, videotapes, recordings and memoranda concerning said investigation of any fraud by any of the assignors(s) and/or policy holder in this case, including, but not limited to any SIU reports, investigative reports, and EUO Transcripts. 23) INTERROGATORY (23): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether Plaintiff insurance company is claiming that the provider and/or plaintiff in this case have committed fraud in this case. b) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the basis of claiming that any of the provider and/or plaintiff committed fraud in this case. c) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of any and all reports, notes, documents, transcripts, videotapes, recordings and memoranda concerning said investigation of any fraud by any of the provider and/or plaintiff in this case, including, but not limited to any SIU reports, investigative reports, and EUO Transcripts. 24) INTERROGATORY (24}: For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether Insurance Company is claiming that there is no coverage in this case. 11 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 b) Ifthe answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the basis of claiming that there is no coverage in this case. c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth true and accurate copies of any and all reports, notes, documents, transcripts, videotapes, recordings and memoranda concerning no coverage in this case, including, but not limited to any SIU reports, investigative reports, and EUO Transcripts. 25) INTERROGATORY (25): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff alleges that the instant matter is covered by Worker's compensation and not No-Fault. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, please set forth true and accurate copies of any and allreports, notes, documents, transcripts, videotapes, recordings and memoranda concerning Plaintiff's allegation that the instant claim is covered by Worker's Compensation. 26) INTERROGATORY (26): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the Plaintiff alleges that the assignor(s)'s injuries occurred during the course ofthe assignor(s)'s employment and was not involved in an automobile accident. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, please set forth true and accurate copies of any and all reports, notes, documents, transcripts, videotapes, recordings and memoranda. 27) INTERROGATORY (27): For Each Claim: a) If the Plaintiff denied plaintiff's claim based on an alleged failure to appear for any Examination Under Oath and/or Independent Medical Examination set forth: 1) Any Names of any companies, corporations or third party companies and/or affiliates and/or third party vendors that allegedly forward notices of said appearances to plaintiff. 28) INTERROGATORY (28): For Each Claim: a) Set forth whether the individual answering these interrogatories received a copy of Regulation 68 from Plaintiff at any time during the course of their employment with Plaintiff. b) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth the date it was received. 12 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 c) If the answer to subdivision (a) of this interrogatory is in the affirmative, set forth whether the answering individual read and familiarized themselves with the copy of Reg. 68 provided by Plaintiff. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that this demand is a continuing demand, and in the event knowledge is acquired subsequent to the receipt of this demand, up to and including the trialof this action, you are required to set forth in writing, and under oath, the name and address of such persons. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, in the event this Demand is not complied with the plaintiff will, upon the trial of this action, move the court to preclude and forbid the testimony of any witness offered by the Plaintiff as to what has not thereto been furnished to the plaintiff's attorneys, pursuant to this Demand. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your default will result in an application being made to the Court for the appropriate relief, with costs. Dated: WANTAGH NY July 2, 2018 JOSEPH J ADR CCO ESQ Law Offi es of G riel & Shapiro L.L.C. Atto ys for D fendant YJR UPUN TURE PC 3361 ark enue, Ste 1000 Want , ew York11793 Tel.516-783-6565 To: Burke, CONWAY & Dillon Attomey for Plaintiffs LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO 10 Bank Street,Suite 1200 White Plains, NY 10606 13 of 26 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2018 09:25 AM INDEX NO. 652670/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ______________________________________..___________________________________________ LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. PLAINTIFF, INDEX NO.: 652670/18 -AGAINST- FILE NO.: GS- 723583 MICHELLE CARTER And DEFENDANT's ARON ROVNER MD, PLLC