On October 31, 2019 a
5. PO
was filed
involving a dispute between
Beletsis, Daphne,
Rainey, Yvonne,
Karki, Bobby,
Leitch, John Dylan,
Thomas, Emmanuel,
and
Davis, Zachary Nash,
Garcia, Moises Tenorio,
Garcia, Rafael,
Guevara, Christopher,
Kahlon, Najpreet Singh,
Karki, Bobby,
King, Derek,
Leitch, John Dylan,
Leon, Stefan Matias,
Mclaughlin, Quinn,
Takayama, Jordan Keiichi,
Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc.,
Theta Iota Chapter Of Theta Chi Fraternity,
Thomas, Emmanuel,
Visacki, Brad,
for (23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD
in the District Court of Santa Cruz County.
Preview
1 Michael C. Osborne (Bar No. 95839)
mosborne@cokinoslaw.com
2 Elaine Kobylecki (Bar No. 299311)
ekobylecki@cokinoslaw.com
3 COKINOS | YOUNG
611 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 233
4 South San Francisco, CA 94080
Telephone: (628) 229-9180
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ
10
11 DAPHNE BELETSIS, et al., Case No. 19CV03287
12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY,
13 v. INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
14 THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC., et al. Date: June 3, 2022
Time: 8:30 AM
15 Defendant. Dept.: 10
16 Action Filed: October 31, 2019
17
18
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
19
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S Motion to
20
21 Quash Subpoena, came on regularly for hearing on June 3, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 10 of
22 the above-entitled Court.
23 After consideration of all moving papers, opposing papers, and reply papers, as well as oral
24
argument before the Court, and good cause otherwise appearing therefor:
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc.’s Motion to Quash
26
Subpoena is GRANTED in its entirety.
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH
SUBPOENA
1 Records served by plaintiffs to RSUI Indemnity Co., on or around February 25, 2022 (“the
2 Subpoena”), is hereby quashed.
3
The records requested in the Subpoena are not relevant. (Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior
4
Court of Los Angeles County (1940) 15 Cal. 2d 206, 209.)
5
The request for records in the Subpoena is overbroad.
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Counsel for Defendant THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC. is ordered to give notice.
9
Dated: __________________ ___________________________________
10 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH
SUBPOENA
Document Filed Date
April 01, 2022
Case Filing Date
October 31, 2019
Category
(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD
Status
03/27/2023 Dispositioned
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 Michael C. Osborne (Bar No. 95839) mosborne@cokinoslaw.com 2 Elaine Kobylecki (Bar No. 299311) ekobylecki@cokinoslaw.com 3 COKINOS | YOUNG 611 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 233 4 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Telephone: (628) 229-9180 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC. 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ 10 11 DAPHNE BELETSIS, et al., Case No. 19CV03287 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, 13 v. INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA 14 THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC., et al. Date: June 3, 2022 Time: 8:30 AM 15 Defendant. Dept.: 10 16 Action Filed: October 31, 2019 17 18 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S Motion to 20 21 Quash Subpoena, came on regularly for hearing on June 3, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 10 of 22 the above-entitled Court. 23 After consideration of all moving papers, opposing papers, and reply papers, as well as oral 24 argument before the Court, and good cause otherwise appearing therefor: 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc.’s Motion to Quash 26 Subpoena is GRANTED in its entirety. 27 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA 1 Records served by plaintiffs to RSUI Indemnity Co., on or around February 25, 2022 (“the 2 Subpoena”), is hereby quashed. 3 The records requested in the Subpoena are not relevant. (Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior 4 Court of Los Angeles County (1940) 15 Cal. 2d 206, 209.) 5 The request for records in the Subpoena is overbroad. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Counsel for Defendant THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC. is ordered to give notice. 9 Dated: __________________ ___________________________________ 10 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA