Complaint,Petition: STATE OF FLORIDA vs. FRANKLIN, PHILLIPPE

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                IM TRE CIRCUIT CougT OF OSCEOLA County , STATE OF FLORIDA
te "a
Stare oF PloeoA case 4 49-17-CF 580
xy, Prana ee
Pricccepe FRANK
de

Juoce TYNEN /morcaN
Ftnoaant

Fetit100 for Warr oc Promeiriong

Comes Now Defennant tnvokine U.S. Frast Amenomeat

Rie e ST

3
Ss

3
Uv
, @
PRomertion OF PRoseauTion, DIScuatet, ANO RELEASE OF DeFEAvAnT . oF aniSSuernue
MALCious PROSECUTION FROM PROSEGUTOR MISConover, \nsTituTiaAg PmosteuTion
UnoeR THE FALSE PRETENSE AS AN ACT OF Good FAITH, Conveyes AS “Btu incottion”
Bera, ACT Sien€d Ano NET oviy Sweeny, BY AN OFFICER OF THE COLES, ALTHOLGH IT mAY HAVE BED
wiengg ano AGT DVLY sween, BY AN OFFICER of THE Court. FAcTS Remain IF AN OFFICER OF THE
Court 16 ALSO A MEMBER OF THE PheSecuTION Ano PlaceO/Aceixeo A SEAL OF NOTARY PuBUucs
Such POCUMEAT {5 PREMWCE. SUCH InsTRUmenT SHOULD BE EnncTED To BE SwoRn, COLLEQNY,
Ano AFFix€o with THE SEAL OF THE CovaT OF PRosECuTION. MARY TEARS TAL STATE OF FLORIDA
WAS ELECTED To FILE CHAGKES WITH THE Loop-HoLe That has/is BEEN Excuseo AS “CLERICAL ceRORY
(EA Déeenoant DOES Nor CHALLENGE THE FILA InfoRMATION Tietey AT HIS] HEE ALEALLAMENT.
OBJEcTINnfe, OVER-Rutiile, AND ABELLWINE THE Notorious “STATE c1ce-ue THE cHARES Aer
WITHOUT EVIDEACE, maTimar witnEsslés) OR VICTIM TESTIMONY SWORN LOADER oatH BY an
OFFICER OR CLERK OF THE CaugT Of JuesDiCTION oF AWECEO CRIME, OFFICERS OF THE cover
WOVE GEtA ToEmne a Buap-ever THE STATE FILED INFoRmaATION OF LACK OF DYE DiLicEence To
INVESTOATE Jus DICTION, AND FinpD BEYOND A REASONABLE COVAT THEIR maTeMAl witness 18 11
Jeoparoy of Beinn 1M PEACHED, TWO [HVESTILATIVE Aeroag) iNchune Tue Stpteare Confucting
SToaiecs) Given To THE Two SwoRA LAW Enforcement AGENCLECs), DEFENDANT SHOULD OF BEtH
AFFORDED RiGuT To Face is ACCUSER RATHER TO PROSeCuTE Fo® PRUMA-FACIE HERR-SAY, AS
AN AN ACT oF Goow FAITH BEING Fok THE GeeATER Coop OF THE PUBLIC AT LARLE To
tawance A FAIR ARO EQuar TRIAL 5 SUPPORTING A GREAT RIGHT To DUE PROCESS, Fact THE

STATE Di FILE LacKinn Suns oreTion , SUBSTANTIAL EvIDENC?, AND MATERIAL WITMESS Uorrl

Covet, DEFEADANT REQDEST GCP mMiEN oF THE CBUeT.

AFACTS FOR PROMI BITION of PROSECUTION
FAARLY THe COURT HAS AWARDED THE CLELADANT AN OCRPORTUNITY TO AN APEITIONAL

Go) oars to TreAtY DISMISS THE ACTION UNoeR FLA.R.CRIMP. B.190 (2A) to cHarrence

FILING Inatmoment, PReSECution FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, SUPPRESSION OF THE LALAWAIL
Soe, Ano THE Volumes cf Revocation SF THE DEFenoanT Rents) wo VS, De PRoctss,

{a} THe Ninte Jvoverar circu CBLET REALM OF PROSECETION LACKS LawruL SORISDICTIOg.
(A) OSctoLa aneest AFFlioAUT STATES INQUIRY ConFrRMEO IT Was REPeRTED OUT OF

MIAMI CARPEns Police DEPT IN NCIC DATABASE

(8) MIAMI Cagvtws PoLILe RepoeyTED iw THE ECC (NCIC DATABASE AS SToLtn

CQ state Mas mostinteO maticious PRoStcuTioN.

(A) PRoSeCuvoR DIO NUT LSE DYE DILIGENCE IA FADE Ie Suarspietion Exist /Aoe.

Dio tT Compact The HEARSAY PRov PED BY Bush POLICE ANO SHERIFE AS VALIDITY

NATO Viet /MATERAL Witness ALLEGATION.

(8) DECEADART CHALLENGED FILIMS INFORMATION IA OPERA COURT To BE DELIWEUED Siencd

AND VAVCE OATH IM THE COuZT TO YPHOLD [T WAS Don’ in 6000 FAITH ANDO Not 1A Pook
Sv0GEmeny, TNE STATE SAT QueT ANDO LATLE HAD INFORMATION DECIVekcs RETRE-

VATEO AFEFIRED SWoeNn Got OF CRT BY A NOTARY PUBLIC WHEN OPpERTUAITY WAS
buw,

CC) Dertnoany Mace RERKST OF HIS U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FACE Hs ACeOSER,

PEEEAOANT Shouro HAVE BIGHT To CHALLTAGE HEar-say, Dicaust Discsvety VAS oy

AVALASLE AGAINST DEFEADANT On DATE OF PeoSECUTION INSTITUT