On November 16, 2021 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
City Of Salinas,
Ntn Properties Llc,
Daniel Ortega,
Diane Middaugh,
Kevin Smith,
Louie Montano,
Louis Montano,
Maira Arellano,
Michael Montano,
Robert Rosett,
Yoselin Garcia,
and
Arturo Alarcon,
Austin Alarcon,
Blfa Properties Llc,
Bryan Caballero Tena,
City Of Salinas,
Gino'S Fine Italian Food, Inc.,
Gino'S Restaurant, Inc.,
Ginos Restaurant, Inc,
Ngochao Thi Nguyen,
Ntn Properties Llc,
Ralph Bozzo,
Rosaura Arcos Paniagua,
for Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23)
in the District Court of Monterey County.
Preview
1 GREENBERG AND RUBY
INJURY ATTORNEYS, APC
2 EMILY A. RUBY, SBN 289433
eruby@caltrialpros.com
3 SERGIO R. CARDENAS, SBN 321239
scardenas@caltrialpros.com
4 6100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1170
Los Angeles, California 90048
5 Telephone No.: (323) 782-0535
Fax No.: (323) 782-0543
6
ALPERS LAW GROUP, INC.
7 RICHARD C. ALPERS - SBN 254646
PO BOX 1540
8 APTOS, CA 95001
Tel. No: (855) 808-1174
9 Fax No: (855) 870-1129
Email: rca@alperslawgroup.com
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
11 LOUIS MONTANO, JR.,
LOUIE MONTANO III, AND MICHAEL MONTANO
12
13 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
14 COUNTY OF LOS MONTEREY
15
LOUIS MONTANO, JR., LOUIE MONTANO Case No.: 21CV003635
16 III, AND MICHAEL MONTANO, Assigned to: Hon. Carrie M. Panetta
Dept. 14
17 Plaintiffs,
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
18 vs. PLAINTIFFS LOUIS MONTANO, JR.,
LOUIE MONTANO III, AND MICHAEL
19 CITY OF SALINAS; GINO’S RESTAURANT, MONTANO’S PETITION FOR ORDER
INC.; GINO’S FINE ITALIAN FOOD, INC.; PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A
20 ROSAURA ARCOS PANIAGUA; AUSTIN GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY
ALARCON; and DOES 1 to 45, inclusive,
21 [Filed concurrently with Notice of Petition and Petition
Defendants. for Order Permitting a Late Claim Against a
22 Governmental Entity; Memorandum of Points and
Authorities; and Declaration of Emily A. Ruby and
23 Exhibits]
24 Date: Friday, June 17, 2022
Time: 8:30 am
25 Dept.: 14
26 Action Filed: November 16, 2021
Trial Date: None Set
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
PETITION FOR ORDER PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY
1 COMES NOW, TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
2 After reviewing the moving documentation, any and all opposition and reply papers, and hearing
3 the oral argument of all parties, the honorable court rules as follows regarding Plaintiffs’ Petition for Order
4 Permitting a Late Claim Against a Governmental Entity:
5 The Court hereby [ GRANTS / DENIES ] Plaintiffs’ Petition for Order Permitting a Late Claim
6 Against a Governmental Entity.
7
8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
9 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
10 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
11 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
12 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
13 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
14
15
16 IT IS SO ORDERED:
17
18 DATED: _____________________ ________________________________
19
HON. CARRIE M. PANETTA
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
PETITION FOR ORDER PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY
1 PROOF OF SERVICE
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
I am employed in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California. My business address is 6100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1170, Los Angeles, CA 90048. My business
4 fax number is (323) 782-0543.
5 On April 1, 2022, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFFS LOUIS MONTANO, JR., LOUIE MONTANO III, AND MICHAEL MONTANO’S
6 PETITION FOR ORDER PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY on the
interested party(ies) in this action as follows:
7
SEE SERVICE LIST
8
[] BY MAIL: I placed said documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses on the
9 attached Service List. I placed the sealed envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business
practices, at Los Angeles, California.
10
I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that
11 practice, on the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary
course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.I am aware
12 that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more
than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
13
[] BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package provided by an overnight
14 delivery carrier and addressed to the persons at the addresses on the attached Service List. I placed the envelope or
package for collection to be deposited at a regular utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
15 [] BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: I caused such documents to be electronically served on the eServe Recipients
registered in this case with the Superior Court of California pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.251.
16
[] BY MESSENGER SERVICE: I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or package addressed to the
17 persons at the addressed listed on the attached Service List and provided them to a professional messenger service for
service.
18
[XX] BY E-MAIL: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by electronic transmission, I
19 caused such document to be delivered electronically to the interested parties at the email address(es) listed on the
attached Service List.
20
[] BY FAX: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax transmission I faxed the
21 documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed on the attached Service List. No error was reported by the fax
machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is attached.
22
STATE [XX] I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and
23 correct.
24
Executed on April 1, 2022, at Los Angeles, California.
25
26 ____________________________ │ KAYLA DOBROTH
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
SERVICE LIST
1
Attorneys for Defendant City of Salinas
2
Christopher A. Callihan, Esq.
3 CITY OF SALINAS, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
200 Lincoln Avenue
4 Salinas, CA 93901-2639
T: (831) 758-7256 (main)
5 T: (831) 758-7073 (direct)
F: (831) 758-7257
6 E: chrisc@ci.salinas.ca.us
7 Co-Counsel for Defendant City of Salinas
8 William R. Price, Esq.
Lisa Shaw, Paralegal
9 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM R. PRICE
12636 High Bluff Dr., Suite 400
10 San Diego, CA 92130
T: (858) 888-0588
11 E: wprice@williamrprice.com; lshaw@williamrprice.com
12 Attorneys for Defendants Ralph Bozzo; BLFA Properties, LLC; and Gino's Fine Italian Food, Inc.
13 James J. Cook, Esq.
HORAN | LLOYD, APC.
14 26385 Carmel Rancho Blvd., Suite 200
Carmel, CA 93923
15 T: (831) 373-4131
F: (831) 373-8302
16 E: jcook@horanlegal.com
17 Attorneys for Defendants Ngochao Thi Nguyen and NTN Properties LLC
18 Matt Zumstein, Esq.
Grant Hespeler, Esq.
19 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 300
20 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
T: (825) 478-3257
21 E: matthew.zumstein@lewisbrisbois.com; grant.hespeler@lewisbrisbois.com; nicole.tavis@lewisbrisbois.com
22 Attorneys for Defendants Austin Alarcon and Rosaura Arcos Paniagua
23 Rodney N. Mayr, Esq.
MAYR LAW FIRM
24 1010 W. Taylor St.
San Jose, CA 95126
25 T: (408) 331-7606
F: (669) 266-5612
26 E: rodney@mayrlawfirm.com
27
28
Co-counsel for Plaintiffs Louis Montano, Jr., Louie Montano III, and Michael Montano
PROOF OF SERVICE
1 Richard C. Alpers
ALPERS LAW GROUP, INC.
2 PO BOX 1540
Aptos, CA 95001
3 T: (855) 808-1174
F: (855) 870-1129
4 E: rca@alperslawgroup.com; clerk@alperslawgroup.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
1 GREENBERG AND RUBY INJURY ATTORNEYS, APC 2 EMILY A. RUBY, SBN 289433 eruby@caltrialpros.com 3 SERGIO R. CARDENAS, SBN 321239 scardenas@caltrialpros.com 4 6100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1170 Los Angeles, California 90048 5 Telephone No.: (323) 782-0535 Fax No.: (323) 782-0543 6 ALPERS LAW GROUP, INC. 7 RICHARD C. ALPERS - SBN 254646 PO BOX 1540 8 APTOS, CA 95001 Tel. No: (855) 808-1174 9 Fax No: (855) 870-1129 Email: rca@alperslawgroup.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 11 LOUIS MONTANO, JR., LOUIE MONTANO III, AND MICHAEL MONTANO 12 13 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 14 COUNTY OF LOS MONTEREY 15 LOUIS MONTANO, JR., LOUIE MONTANO Case No.: 21CV003635 16 III, AND MICHAEL MONTANO, Assigned to: Hon. Carrie M. Panetta Dept. 14 17 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 18 vs. PLAINTIFFS LOUIS MONTANO, JR., LOUIE MONTANO III, AND MICHAEL 19 CITY OF SALINAS; GINO’S RESTAURANT, MONTANO’S PETITION FOR ORDER INC.; GINO’S FINE ITALIAN FOOD, INC.; PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A 20 ROSAURA ARCOS PANIAGUA; AUSTIN GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY ALARCON; and DOES 1 to 45, inclusive, 21 [Filed concurrently with Notice of Petition and Petition Defendants. for Order Permitting a Late Claim Against a 22 Governmental Entity; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; and Declaration of Emily A. Ruby and 23 Exhibits] 24 Date: Friday, June 17, 2022 Time: 8:30 am 25 Dept.: 14 26 Action Filed: November 16, 2021 Trial Date: None Set 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ PETITION FOR ORDER PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY 1 COMES NOW, TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 2 After reviewing the moving documentation, any and all opposition and reply papers, and hearing 3 the oral argument of all parties, the honorable court rules as follows regarding Plaintiffs’ Petition for Order 4 Permitting a Late Claim Against a Governmental Entity: 5 The Court hereby [ GRANTS / DENIES ] Plaintiffs’ Petition for Order Permitting a Late Claim 6 Against a Governmental Entity. 7 8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 12 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED: 17 18 DATED: _____________________ ________________________________ 19 HON. CARRIE M. PANETTA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ PETITION FOR ORDER PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 6100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1170, Los Angeles, CA 90048. My business 4 fax number is (323) 782-0543. 5 On April 1, 2022, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS LOUIS MONTANO, JR., LOUIE MONTANO III, AND MICHAEL MONTANO’S 6 PETITION FOR ORDER PERMITTING A LATE CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY on the interested party(ies) in this action as follows: 7 SEE SERVICE LIST 8 [] BY MAIL: I placed said documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses on the 9 attached Service List. I placed the sealed envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices, at Los Angeles, California. 10 I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that 11 practice, on the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.I am aware 12 that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 13 [] BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package provided by an overnight 14 delivery carrier and addressed to the persons at the addresses on the attached Service List. I placed the envelope or package for collection to be deposited at a regular utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier. 15 [] BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: I caused such documents to be electronically served on the eServe Recipients registered in this case with the Superior Court of California pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.251. 16 [] BY MESSENGER SERVICE: I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or package addressed to the 17 persons at the addressed listed on the attached Service List and provided them to a professional messenger service for service. 18 [XX] BY E-MAIL: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by electronic transmission, I 19 caused such document to be delivered electronically to the interested parties at the email address(es) listed on the attached Service List. 20 [] BY FAX: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax transmission I faxed the 21 documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed on the attached Service List. No error was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is attached. 22 STATE [XX] I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and 23 correct. 24 Executed on April 1, 2022, at Los Angeles, California. 25 26 ____________________________ │ KAYLA DOBROTH 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE SERVICE LIST 1 Attorneys for Defendant City of Salinas 2 Christopher A. Callihan, Esq. 3 CITY OF SALINAS, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 200 Lincoln Avenue 4 Salinas, CA 93901-2639 T: (831) 758-7256 (main) 5 T: (831) 758-7073 (direct) F: (831) 758-7257 6 E: chrisc@ci.salinas.ca.us 7 Co-Counsel for Defendant City of Salinas 8 William R. Price, Esq. Lisa Shaw, Paralegal 9 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM R. PRICE 12636 High Bluff Dr., Suite 400 10 San Diego, CA 92130 T: (858) 888-0588 11 E: wprice@williamrprice.com; lshaw@williamrprice.com 12 Attorneys for Defendants Ralph Bozzo; BLFA Properties, LLC; and Gino's Fine Italian Food, Inc. 13 James J. Cook, Esq. HORAN | LLOYD, APC. 14 26385 Carmel Rancho Blvd., Suite 200 Carmel, CA 93923 15 T: (831) 373-4131 F: (831) 373-8302 16 E: jcook@horanlegal.com 17 Attorneys for Defendants Ngochao Thi Nguyen and NTN Properties LLC 18 Matt Zumstein, Esq. Grant Hespeler, Esq. 19 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 300 20 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 T: (825) 478-3257 21 E: matthew.zumstein@lewisbrisbois.com; grant.hespeler@lewisbrisbois.com; nicole.tavis@lewisbrisbois.com 22 Attorneys for Defendants Austin Alarcon and Rosaura Arcos Paniagua 23 Rodney N. Mayr, Esq. MAYR LAW FIRM 24 1010 W. Taylor St. San Jose, CA 95126 25 T: (408) 331-7606 F: (669) 266-5612 26 E: rodney@mayrlawfirm.com 27 28 Co-counsel for Plaintiffs Louis Montano, Jr., Louie Montano III, and Michael Montano PROOF OF SERVICE 1 Richard C. Alpers ALPERS LAW GROUP, INC. 2 PO BOX 1540 Aptos, CA 95001 3 T: (855) 808-1174 F: (855) 870-1129 4 E: rca@alperslawgroup.com; clerk@alperslawgroup.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE