On March 17, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Incorporated,
and
Pina, Michelle Lee,
for OTHER CIVIL
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2016-17256
BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
OPERATIONS, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
MICHELLE LEE PINA,
Defendant. 189TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Baker Hughes’s Motion to Strike Second Supplemental
Affidavit, And in the Alternative, Objections and Reply to Defendant’s Second Supplement to
Defendant’s Special Appearance. After reviewing the Motion, and any response, pleadings, and
arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is hereby in all things
GRANTED, and the Affidavit of Michelle Lee Pina in Response to Plaintiff’s Supplemental
Reply Re Special Appearance is hereby stricken. Baker Hughes’s Objections to Defendant’s
Supplement to Defendant’s Special Appearance are further hereby SUSTAINED
SIGNED this the ______ day of __________________, 2016.
JUDGE PRESIDING
27185041v.1
Document Filed Date
June 02, 2016
Case Filing Date
March 17, 2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2016-17256 BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OPERATIONS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MICHELLE LEE PINA, Defendant. 189TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER Pending before the Court is Baker Hughes’s Motion to Strike Second Supplemental Affidavit, And in the Alternative, Objections and Reply to Defendant’s Second Supplement to Defendant’s Special Appearance. After reviewing the Motion, and any response, pleadings, and arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is hereby in all things GRANTED, and the Affidavit of Michelle Lee Pina in Response to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Reply Re Special Appearance is hereby stricken. Baker Hughes’s Objections to Defendant’s Supplement to Defendant’s Special Appearance are further hereby SUSTAINED SIGNED this the ______ day of __________________, 2016. JUDGE PRESIDING 27185041v.1