On March 25, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Valerio, Marta Santamaria,
and
Braud, David,
Uber Technologies, Inc.,
for MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC-20-04802
MARTA SAN TAMARIA VALERIO, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff, g
v. g 134TH DISTRICT COURT
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND g
DAVID BRAUD, §
Defendants. g DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES
AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
On this date came on to be considered Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Motion to
Equalize Peremptory Strikes (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) and Motion to Continue Trial (“Defendant
UTI’s Motion”), filed in response with its Response to Plaintiff‘s Motion to Equalize Peremptory
Strikes and Notice of Conflicting Trials. Defendant UTI in the above-entitled and numbered cause
requests this Court DENY Plaintiff‘s Motion and GRANT UTI’s Motion to Continue the current
trial setting of March 7, 2022, in this case. The Court, being of the opinion that good cause has
been shown to grant the relief requested, finds that Plaintiff’s Motion should be DENIED, and the
parties shall all maintain the number of peremptory strikes as allotted under the Texas Rules.
Additionally, the Court finds Defendant UTI’s Motion to Continue Trial should in all respects be
GMNTED.
It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendant’s Motion
to Continue Trial herein be, and same hereby is, GRANTED. Plaintiff s Motion to Equalize
Peremptory Strikes is DENIED.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION To EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES
AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE PAGE 1
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-entitled and
numbered cause be, and same hereby is, removed from the Court's March 7, 2022, tn'al docket and
is reset to
SIGNED this day of ,2022.
HONORABLE JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION To EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES
AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE PAGE 2
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Mary Baker on behalf of Mary Baker
Bar No. 24062598
mary@rudnickifirm.com
Envelope ID: 61977713
Status as of 2/23/2022 8:06 AM CST
Associated Case Party: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
Mary W.Baker mary@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Margaret J.Meier margie@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Becky Robinson becky@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Caroline J.Lewis caroline@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Associated Case Party: DAVID BRAUD
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
Neely Fortinberry nfortinberry@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Catina Lorenzo clorenzo@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Randi Billingsley rbillingsley@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Janis Morris jmorris@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
C. Justin Broome jbroome@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Case Contacts
Name
Langdon Milton Smith
Sara Baylis
Adrian Moreno
Maria Herrera
Nicholas Monroe
Francine Ly
Margaret Meier
Case Manager
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Mary Baker on behalf of Mary Baker
Bar No. 24062598
mary@rudnickifirm.com
Envelope ID: 61977713
Status as of 2/23/2022 8:06 AM CST
Case Contacts
janis Morris jmorris@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT
Document Filed Date
February 22, 2022
Case Filing Date
March 25, 2020
Category
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC-20-04802 MARTA SAN TAMARIA VALERIO, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, g v. g 134TH DISTRICT COURT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND g DAVID BRAUD, § Defendants. g DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL On this date came on to be considered Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) and Motion to Continue Trial (“Defendant UTI’s Motion”), filed in response with its Response to Plaintiff‘s Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes and Notice of Conflicting Trials. Defendant UTI in the above-entitled and numbered cause requests this Court DENY Plaintiff‘s Motion and GRANT UTI’s Motion to Continue the current trial setting of March 7, 2022, in this case. The Court, being of the opinion that good cause has been shown to grant the relief requested, finds that Plaintiff’s Motion should be DENIED, and the parties shall all maintain the number of peremptory strikes as allotted under the Texas Rules. Additionally, the Court finds Defendant UTI’s Motion to Continue Trial should in all respects be GMNTED. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial herein be, and same hereby is, GRANTED. Plaintiff s Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes is DENIED. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION To EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE PAGE 1 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-entitled and numbered cause be, and same hereby is, removed from the Court's March 7, 2022, tn'al docket and is reset to SIGNED this day of ,2022. HONORABLE JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION To EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE PAGE 2 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Mary Baker on behalf of Mary Baker Bar No. 24062598 mary@rudnickifirm.com Envelope ID: 61977713 Status as of 2/23/2022 8:06 AM CST Associated Case Party: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Mary W.Baker mary@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Margaret J.Meier margie@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Becky Robinson becky@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Caroline J.Lewis caroline@rudnickifirm.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Associated Case Party: DAVID BRAUD Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Neely Fortinberry nfortinberry@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Catina Lorenzo clorenzo@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Randi Billingsley rbillingsley@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Janis Morris jmorris@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT C. Justin Broome jbroome@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT Case Contacts Name Langdon Milton Smith Sara Baylis Adrian Moreno Maria Herrera Nicholas Monroe Francine Ly Margaret Meier Case Manager Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Mary Baker on behalf of Mary Baker Bar No. 24062598 mary@rudnickifirm.com Envelope ID: 61977713 Status as of 2/23/2022 8:06 AM CST Case Contacts janis Morris jmorris@ekvallbyrne.com 2/22/2022 3:44:24 PM SENT