On May 25, 2021 a Party Notice was filed involving a dispute between Andrew Yen, Ball, James, Blanco, Kaitlin, James Ball, Kaitlin Blanco, Melina Tessier, Tessier, Melina, Yen, Andrew, and 1428 Jackson Strret Associates, Lp, 553 Sycamore Street Associates, Lp, Conservice, Llc, Fpi Management, Inc., Mosser, Neveo, Neveo Mosser, Oak 1425 Harrison Street Property, Llc, Oak 1428 Jackson, Llc, Oak 406 Van Buren Ave. Property, Llc, Oak-553 Sycamore, Llc, Oak9 Portfolio Owner, Lp, Pach Affordable Holdings, Llc, The Mosser Companies, Inc., Yardi Systems, Inc., Yes Energy Management, Inc., for Unlimited Civil in the District Court of Alameda County.
June 09, 2021
May 25, 2021
Unlimited Civil
10/17/2023 03:30 PM Party
1428 Jackson Strret Associates, LP Def
1428 Jackson Strret Associates, LP Defendant
1428 Jackson Strret Associates, LP Party
1428 JACKSON STRRET ASSOCIATES, LP Defendant
553 Sycamore Street Associates, LP Def
553 Sycamore Street Associates, LP Defendant
553 Sycamore Street Associates, LP Party
553 SYCAMORE STREET ASSOCIATES, LP Defendant
Abraham Aleem Tabaie Attorneys for Defendants
Abraham Aleem Tabaie Attorney
Abraham Aleem Tabaie Party
Andrew Yen Party
Andrew Yen Plain
Andrew Yen Plaintiff
Anna S Mclean Att
Anna S Mclean Attorney
Anna S Mclean Attorney (lead Attorney)
Anna S Mclean Party
BALL, JAMES Plaintiff
Barbara Jean Parker Att
Barbara Jean Parker Attorney
Barbara Jean Parker Party
BLANCO, KAITLIN Plaintiff
City of Oakland Non-party
City of Oakland Party
City of Oakland Tpty
Conservice, LLC Def
Conservice, LLC Defendant
Conservice, LLC Party
CONSERVICE, LLC Defendant
Ethan L. Silverstein Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FPI Management, Inc. Def
FPI Management, Inc. Defendant
FPI Management, Inc. Party
FPI MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendant
George A. Guthrie Attorneys for Defendants
George A. Guthrie Attorney
George A. Guthrie Former Attorney (lead Attorney)
George A. Guthrie Party
GUTHRIE, GEORGE A. Attorneys for Defendants
James Ball Party
James Ball Plain
James Ball Plaintiff
Jeffrey Michael Vucinich Attorneys for Defendants
Jeffrey Michael Vucinich Attorney
Jeffrey Michael Vucinich Party
John M. Neukom Attorneys for Defendants
John M. Neukom Attorney
John M. Neukom Attorney (associated Attorney)
John M. Neukom Party
Kaitlin Blanco Party
Kaitlin Blanco Plain
Kaitlin Blanco Plaintiff
Katherine S Catlos Attorneys for Defendants
Katherine S Catlos Attorney
Katherine S Catlos Party
L Theodore Scheley, III Attorney
L Theodore Scheley, III - III Att
L Theodore Scheley, III - III Attorney
L Theodore Scheley, III - III Attorney (lead Attorney)
L Theodore Scheley, III - III Party
Melina Tessier Party
Melina Tessier Plain
Melina Tessier Plaintiff
MOSSER, NEVEO Defendant
NEUKOM, JOHN M. Attorneys for Defendants
Neveo Mosser Def
Neveo Mosser Defendant
Neveo Mosser Party
Oak 1425 Harrison Street Property, LLC Def
Oak 1425 Harrison Street Property, LLC Defendant
Oak 1425 Harrison Street Property, LLC Party
OAK 1425 HARRISON STREET PROPERTY, LLC Defendant
Oak 1428 Jackson, LLC Def
Oak 1428 Jackson, LLC Defendant
Oak 1428 Jackson, LLC Party
OAK 1428 JACKSON, LLC Defendant
Oak 406 Van Buren Ave. Property, LLC Def
Oak 406 Van Buren Ave. Property, LLC Defendant
Oak 406 Van Buren Ave. Property, LLC Party
OAK 406 VAN BUREN AVE. PROPERTY, LLC Defendant
Oak-553 Sycamore, LLC Def
Oak-553 Sycamore, LLC Defendant
Oak-553 Sycamore, LLC Party
OAK-553 SYCAMORE, LLC Defendant
Oak9 Portfolio Owner, LP Def
Oak9 Portfolio Owner, LP Defendant
Oak9 Portfolio Owner, LP Party
OAK9 PORTFOLIO OWNER, LP Defendant
Pach Affordable Holdings, LLC Def
Pach Affordable Holdings, LLC Defendant
Pach Affordable Holdings, LLC Party
PACH AFFORDABLE HOLDINGS, LLC Defendant
Robert A. Salinas Att
Robert A. Salinas Attorney
Robert A. Salinas Attorney (lead Attorney)
Robert A. Salinas Party
Robert Salinas Attorney
SALINAS, ROBERT Attorney
SCHELEY III, L THEODORE Attorney
Stephen Alter Scott Attorneys for Defendants
Stephen Alter Scott Attorney
Stephen Alter Scott Attorney (lead Attorney)
Stephen Alter Scott Party
Stephen A. Scott Attorneys for Defendants
TESSIER, MELINA Plaintiff
The Mosser Companies, INc. Def
The Mosser Companies, INc. Defendant
The Mosser Companies, INc. Party
THE MOSSER COMPANIES, INC. Defendant
Yardi Systems, Inc. Def
Yardi Systems, Inc. Defendant
Yardi Systems, Inc. Party
YARDI SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant
YEN, ANDREW Plaintiff
Yes Energy Management, Inc. Def
Yes Energy Management, Inc. Defendant
Yes Energy Management, Inc. Party
YES ENERGY MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendant
Joseph Sakai Attorney
Lloyd Scheley Attorneys for Defendants
Xiong Zhou Attorneys for Defendants
Leah Simon-Weisberg Attorney
Jacqueline Zaneri Attorney
Annie Banh Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Enrique Martinez Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Raza Rasheed Attorneys for Defendants
Kathryne Baldwin Attorneys for Defendants
Arielle Brown Attorneys for Defendants
Maria Bee Attorney
Ubaldo Fernandez Attorney
Arthur Friedman Attorneys for Defendants
Islam Ahmad Attorneys for Defendants
Jessica Su Attorneys for Defendants
Charles Tillage Attorneys for Defendants
Benjamin Chen Attorneys for Defendants
Daniel Marcus Attorneys for Defendants
Rocio Toriz Attorneys for Plaintiffs
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
oe Oo e ‘ong | CM-015 ATTORNEYORPARTYWITHOUTATTORNEY(Name, State Bar number, anc address): FORCOURTUSE ONLY Robert Salinas (Bar # 184260 +- SALINAS LAW GROUP, 428 13thStreet, 8th Floor, Oakland,CA 94612 Enrique Martinez (Bar# 206884) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN E. HILL,333 Eegenberger Rd., Suite 500, Oakland, CA 94621 a TELEPHONENO.: (510) 663-9240 FAX.NO. (Optional): (510) 663-9241 i> | ADDRESS E-MAIL bob@ssrplaw.com; (Optional): emartinez15@comcast.net Al anne i i beaD ATTORNEYFOR(Namo): Plaintiffs ANDREW YEN, et al. aan reel a = If SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA JUN 0 9,? streetappress: 1225 Fallon Street 021 MAILING ADDRESS: i. 5 te ins* Cue, " city anpzipcope: Oakland 94612 B¢: re em BrancHName: Rene C. Davidson Courthouse bi, Sep 5; ~ CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ANDREW YEN, et al. RG21-100261 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: NEVEO MOSSER, et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Brad Seligman . DEPT... NOTICE OF RELATED CASE , 2B Identify, inchronologicalorderaccordingto dateof filirg, allcasesrelatedto thecase referencedabove. 1, a. Title:ABDERRAHMAN BOULAKDEM, et al.v. NEVEO MOSSER, et al.. b. Case number: RG?21-100186 c. Court: same asabove ; ["_] otherstateor federalcourt(name and address): d. Department: 21 e. Case type: L_] limited civil: unlimitedcivil[—_] probate [__] familylaw [[_] other (specify): f. Filing date: May 25, 2021 g. Has thiscase been designated ordetermined as "complex?" [__] Yes No h. Relationshipofthiscase tothe casereferenced above (check all thatapply): involvesthesame partiesand isbased on thesame orsimilarclaims. C4] arisesfrom thesame orsubstantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring thedeterminationo7 thesame orsubstantially identical questions oflaw orfact. L__] involvesclaimsagainst,title to,possession of, or damages tothe same property. [<1 islikely forotherreasons to requiresubstantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. LX] Additionalexplanationisattachedinattachment 1h , i.Statusof case: pending [] dismissed [__] with [-_] withcutprejudice [__] disposed ofby judgment 2. a Title: AARON ROGACHEVSKY, et al. v. NEVEO MOSSER, et al. b. Case number: RG21-100506 c. Court: [X] same asabove L_] .otherstateor federalcourt(name and adaress): d. Department: 21 Page1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use - Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NO - ICE OF RELATED CASE waw.courtinio.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] _ LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial CouncilForms CM-015 | PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ANDREW YEN, et al CASENUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: NEVEO MOSSER, et al. RG?21-100261 2. (continued) e. Case type: L_] limited civ’ LX] unlimizedcivil [_] probate [_] familylaw [~_] other(specify): f. Filing date: May 28, 2021 g. Has thiscase been designated ordetermined as“complex?” [__] Yes No h. Relationshipofthiscase tothecase referenced above {checkailthatapply): involvesthesame partiesand isbased on thesame orsimilarclaims. {] _arisesfrom thesame orsubstantially identical transactions, incidents, or eventsrequiringthedeterminationof the same or substantially identical questions oflaw orfact. L__] involvesclaimsagainst,title to,possessionof,or damages tothesame property. [x] islikely forotherreasons to require substantialduplication ofjudicial resources if heard by different judges. Additionalexplanationisattackedinattachment 2h i.Status ofcase: pending [-] dismissed [—_] with [__] witaoutprejudice [-] disposed ofby judgment 3. a. TitlesANDREW ROSENBERG, et al.v. NEVEO MOSSER, et al. Case number: RG?21-100160 c. Court: same asabove [__] otherstateor federal court (name and address): . d. Department: 21 . e. Case type: [__] limited civil unlimitedcivil’ [__] probate [__] familylaw [__] other(specify): Filing date: May 25, 2021 | Has thiscase been designated ordetermined as"complex?" [| Yes No QoQ Relationshipofthiscase tothecase referenced above (checkallthatapply): zx involvesthesame partiesand isbased on thesame orsimilarclaims. [__] arisesfrom thesame orsubstantially identical transactions, incidents, or eventsrequiring-the determinationcf thesame orsubstantially identical questions oflaw orfact. [1] involvesclaimsagainst,title to,possessionof,or damages.to thesame property. ; islikely forotherreasons to require substantialduplication ofjudicial resources if heard by different judges. [x] Additionalexplanationisattached in attachment 3h i.Statusof case: pending (__] dismissed [__] with [__] withoutprejudice ([__]. disposed ofby judgment 4, Additionalrelatedcasesare describedin Mtachment 4. Number ofpages attached: _1 Date: June 9, 2021 Robert Salinas > 7 (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OFPARTYORATTORNEY) . (SIGNATURE OFPARTYORATTORNEY) CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007) NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Page2 of 3 LexisNexis® Au‘omated California Judicial Council Forms CM-015 CASENUMBER: L— PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:ANDREW YEN, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: NEVEO MOSSER, et al. RG21-100261 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice ofRelated Case if you area partyin theaction. The person who served the noticemust complete thisproof ofservice. The notice must be served on allknown partiesin each relatedaction orproceeding.) 1. lam at least18years oldand not a partyto thisaction. | ama residentoforemployed inthecounty where the mailingtook place,and my residence orbusiness address is(specify): _2. | servedacopy of theNoticeof RelatedCase byenclosing it in a sealedenvelopewith first-class postage fully prepaidand (check one): a. LJ depositedthe sealedenvelope withthe UnitedStates PostalService. b. LJ placed thesealed envelopeforcollectionand processingformailing, followingthisbusiness'susualpractices, withwhich | am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence isplaced forcollection and mailing,it is deposited intheordinarycourse ofbusiness withtheUnited StatesPostalService. 3. The Noticeof RelatedCase was mailed: a. on (date): b. from (city and state): 4. The envelope was addressed and mailed asfollows: _ a. Name ofperson served: c. Name ofperson served: Streetaddress: Streetaddress: City: City: Stateand zip code: Stateand zipcode: b. Name ofperson served: d. Name ofperson served: Streetaddress: Streetaddress: City: City: Stateand zipcode: Stateand zipcode: LJ Names and addresses ofadditionalpersonsserved are attached.(Youmay use formPOS-030(P).) | declare under penaltyof perjury under the lawsofthe StateofCaliforniathattheforegoingistrueand correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OFDECLARANT) (SIGNATURE OFDECLARANT) CM-016 Rev.July 1, 2007 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Page Council 3 of 3 Forms ATTACHMENT Attachment 1h Common issues with unlawful utility splitting and other unlawful practices in violation of Oakland Ordinances. Attachment 2h Common issues with unlawful utility splitting and other unlawful practices in violation of Oakland Ordinances. Attachment 3h Common issues with unlawful utility splitting and other unlawful practices in violation of Oakland Ordinances. Attachment 4: Additional Related Cases” Case Name: MARTIN ANNUS, et al.v. NEVEO MOSSER, et al. aes Case Number: RG21-100259 Court: same as above Department: 23 Case Type: unlimited civil ho Filing Date: May 25, 2021 Has this case been designated or determined as “complex?” No SR = Involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. | » Additional explanation of 4h: Common issues with unlawful utility splitting and other unlawful practices in violation of Oakland Ordinances. i. Status: pending. YEN, etal. v. MOSSER, et al.