arrow left
arrow right
  • Luis H. Higareda et al. vs KB Home Sacramento, Inc. Unlimited Civil Construction Defect (Complex Litigation) document preview
  • Luis H. Higareda et al. vs KB Home Sacramento, Inc. Unlimited Civil Construction Defect (Complex Litigation) document preview
  • Luis H. Higareda et al. vs KB Home Sacramento, Inc. Unlimited Civil Construction Defect (Complex Litigation) document preview
  • Luis H. Higareda et al. vs KB Home Sacramento, Inc. Unlimited Civil Construction Defect (Complex Litigation) document preview
  • Luis H. Higareda et al. vs KB Home Sacramento, Inc. Unlimited Civil Construction Defect (Complex Litigation) document preview
  • Luis H. Higareda et al. vs KB Home Sacramento, Inc. Unlimited Civil Construction Defect (Complex Litigation) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CHECKED CLERK Atl VD NEWMEYER & DILLION LLP FILED JONATHAN N. KING, CBN 227121 SUPERIOR COURT dJonathan.King@ndlf.com Brandon E. Riley, Clerk 1333 N. California Blvd, Suite 600 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Rita Gomez (925) 988-3200; (925) 988-3290 (Fax) December 09, 2020 Attorneys for Defendant KB Home Sacramento, Inc. fka KB Home North Bay, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN 10 14 LUIS H, HIGAREDA, et al CASE NO. STK-CV-UCD-2020- 5704 12 Plaintiff, 13 VS. STIPULATION AND 2 B ORDER STAYING CASE PURSUANT TO 14 KB HOME SACRAMENTO, INC., et al. RIGHT TO REPAIR ACT (SB800) 15 Defendant. FILE DATE July 2, 2020 TRIAL DATE SET: No Date Set ky 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs LUIS H. HIGAREDA, 17 et a 18 al. (hereinafter “PLAINTIFFS") and Defendant KB HOME SACRAMENTO, INC. fka KB 19 HOME NORTH BAY, INC. (hereinafter “KB”) by and through their respective counsel, as 20 follows: 21 1 WHEREAS the four (4) homes at issue in this action, as identified below, 22 are subject to the Right to Repair Act (Cal. Civ. Code section 895, etseq.) (hereinafter 23 “the Right toRepair Act’): 24 25 Homeowner Address 26 4 Luis H, Higareda and 2617 Hayden Brook Drive, Stockton, CA Diane M. Higared 27 2 Prince S. Gaye 1840 Chapelle Court, Stockton, CA 95212 28 882.589/ 8934630. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PURSUANT TO RIGHT TO REPAIR ACT (SB800) 3 Shawn Coleman 4122 Marchesotti Way, Stockton, CA 95205 4 Adam Cruz 3963 Marchesotii Way, Stockton, CA 95205 2 WHEREAS PLAINTIFFS and KB wish to avoid the time and expense involved with the adjudication of a Motion to Stay pursuant to the Right to Repair Act; 3 NOW THEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS and KB agree as follows: A This matter shall be stayed for all purposes pending PLAINTIFFS compliance with the Right to Repair Act; B Neither PLAINTIFFS nor KB waive any rights that either may have 10 by agreeing to this stay, and either may seek the Court's intervention to enforce the i Right to Repair Act, as applicable, or lift the stay, if necessary; 12 c. KB's responsive pleading is not due until thirty (20) days after the ® 13 e Stay is lifted; and 14 D. PLAINTIFFS and KB request that the Court set a status conference 15 on a date approximately 120 days after the date of this Stipulation to review the status of 16 the stay of this matter. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 882,589 / 8934630.1 a2= STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER S TAYING CASE PURSUANT TO RIGHT TO REPAIR Aer (SB800) 1} ITISso STIPULATED: 2 ” Dated: December, 2020 SHINNICK & RYAN, LLP By: JAMA Mec ody Chadd! ko Attorn for Plain Dated: December, 3, 2020 NEWMEYER & DILL i ny Jonathan N. King Attorneys for Defendant Kb Home Sacramento, Inc. fka KB Home North A “Bay, Inc. i pie: 12 IT IS SO ORDE 13 Date Dec 9, 202 00:40 A 14 Judge of tl uperior Court 15 ROGER ROSS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 882.589 / 8934630.1, -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PURSUANT TO RIGHT TO REPAIR ACT (SB800)