arrow left
arrow right
  • EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE  vs.  JUAN BARBOSAOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE  vs.  JUAN BARBOSAOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE  vs.  JUAN BARBOSAOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE  vs.  JUAN BARBOSAOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE  vs.  JUAN BARBOSAOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE  vs.  JUAN BARBOSAOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-18-18847 EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § § Plaindfi § § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. § § JUAN BARBOSA, § § Dcféndant. § 192ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT This case came on for trial before the Court 0n January 7, 2022. Plaintiff Eduardo Del Bosque and Defendant Juan Barbosa appeared by and through their attorneys and announced ready for trial. Plaintiff’s claim for breach of an oral contract was tried to a panel of thirteen jurors, as was Defendant’s affirmative defense of prior material breach. Plaintist alternative claim for quantum meruit was also tried to the jury. No other claims or defenses were tried to the jury. Prior to trial, the parties agreed to reserve the issue of Plaintist recovery of reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees under Chapter 37 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code for determination by the Court via submission following trial. During a one-day trial held on January 7, 2022, the parties submitted evidence and arguments for the jury’s consideration. Based on the evidence, the jury found in favor of Plaintiff on his breach of contract claim and awarded him $117,182.97. Accordingly, the Court finds that the following judgment should be entered. The Court hereby ORDERS that judgment is entered for Plaintiff on his breach of contract claim in the amount of $117,182.97. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file any motion for recovery of attorneys’ fees by February 7, 2022, including requests for recovery of reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees in the ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY 0F JUDGMENT PAGE 1 event that Defendant appeals this Judgment. Because the issue of Plaintiff’ srecovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees is has not yet been decided, this judgment is not yet final, and, accordingly, is not yet appealable. It is further ORDERED that all writs and processes may issue as necessary for the enforcement and collection of this judgment and Plaintiff shall recover his additional costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith following entry of a judgment in this matter. All other relief not expressly granted in this Judgment is denied. Dated ,2022 JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY 0F JUDGMENT PAGE 2 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Envelope ID: 61167110 Status as of 1/26/2022 3:22 PM CST Associated Case Party: EDUARDO DEL BOSQUE Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Gregory Brassfield gbrassfield@lynnllp.com 1/26/2022 12:21 :12 PM SENT Christopher W.Patton cpatton@lynnllp.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status David M.O'Dens odens@settlepou.com 1/26/2022 12:21 :12 PM SENT April Sandefur asandefur@lynnllp.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Jordan Whiddon jwhiddon@tailimsong.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Yuliana Ramirez yuliana@tailimsong.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Daniel Polese 24102364 dpolese@lynnllp.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Tailim Song tsong@tailimsong.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Debra Camacho dcamacho@settlepou.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT Pam Oakley poakley@lynnllp.com 1/26/2022 12:21:12 PM SENT