On May 25, 2021 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cavuototm, Gina Marie,
and
Moise Nahouraii,
for (08) Unlimited Civil Rights
in the District Court of Santa Cruz County.
Preview
Todd A. Angstadt (SBN 166404)
Micah A. H. Yospe (SBN 281350)
2 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLP
560 Mission Street, Suite 1010
3 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone (415) 278-9400
4 Facsimile (415) 278-9411
5 Attorneys for Defendant
MOISE NAHOURAII
6
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7
CITY AND COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
8
9 Case No.: 21CV0l 326
GINA MARIE CAVUOTOrM in persona,
10
Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S
11 UNAUTHORIZED REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
v. OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER AND REPLY
12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO
MOISE NAHOURAII of Referral Realty c/o Kimora MOTION TO STRIKE
13 Family Trust,
Date: February 15, 2022
14 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Defendant. Dept: 5
15
Complaint Filed: May 25, 2021
16 Trial Date: Not Set
17
18 Defendant MOISE NAHOURAII hereby objections and respectfully requests that the Court disregard in
19 entirety "Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Opposition to Second Demurrer'' and "Plaintiff's Reply Brief in
20 Support of Opposition to Motion to Strike" which plaintiff filed and served on February 4, 2022. Plaintiff filed
21 these "reply briefs" after she already filed her opposition briefs to Defendant's demurrer and motion to strike,
22 respectively, and after Defendant filed his responsive reply briefs earlier in the day on February 4, 2022.
23 Neither the California Rules of Court nor the Local Rules provide for the filing of a "reply brief" by the
24 opposing party after the opposition and reply have been filed. The California Rules of Court and the
25 California Code of Civil Procedure contemplate that only moving papers (by the moving party), opposition
26 papers (by the opposing party), and reply papers (by the moving party) are allowed. (Cal. Rules of Court Rule
27 3.l 113(d); CCP § 1005.) A subsequent "reply" brief by the opposing party is not contemplated by these rules
28 and is not permitted. Plaintiff has not provided any authority for the filing of these subsequent "reply" briefs
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S UNAUTHORIZED REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER AND
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document Filed Date
February 09, 2022
Case Filing Date
May 25, 2021
Category
(08) Unlimited Civil Rights
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.