arrow left
arrow right
  • Gina CavuotoTM vs Moise Nahouraii(08) Unlimited Civil Rights document preview
  • Gina CavuotoTM vs Moise Nahouraii(08) Unlimited Civil Rights document preview
  • Gina CavuotoTM vs Moise Nahouraii(08) Unlimited Civil Rights document preview
  • Gina CavuotoTM vs Moise Nahouraii(08) Unlimited Civil Rights document preview
  • Gina CavuotoTM vs Moise Nahouraii(08) Unlimited Civil Rights document preview
  • Gina CavuotoTM vs Moise Nahouraii(08) Unlimited Civil Rights document preview
						
                                

Preview

Todd A. Angstadt (SBN 166404) Micah A. H. Yospe (SBN 281350) 2 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLP 560 Mission Street, Suite 1010 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone (415) 278-9400 4 Facsimile (415) 278-9411 5 Attorneys for Defendant MOISE NAHOURAII 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 8 9 Case No.: 21CV0l 326 GINA MARIE CAVUOTOrM in persona, 10 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S 11 UNAUTHORIZED REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT v. OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER AND REPLY 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOISE NAHOURAII of Referral Realty c/o Kimora MOTION TO STRIKE 13 Family Trust, Date: February 15, 2022 14 Time: 8:30 a.m. Defendant. Dept: 5 15 Complaint Filed: May 25, 2021 16 Trial Date: Not Set 17 18 Defendant MOISE NAHOURAII hereby objections and respectfully requests that the Court disregard in 19 entirety "Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Opposition to Second Demurrer'' and "Plaintiff's Reply Brief in 20 Support of Opposition to Motion to Strike" which plaintiff filed and served on February 4, 2022. Plaintiff filed 21 these "reply briefs" after she already filed her opposition briefs to Defendant's demurrer and motion to strike, 22 respectively, and after Defendant filed his responsive reply briefs earlier in the day on February 4, 2022. 23 Neither the California Rules of Court nor the Local Rules provide for the filing of a "reply brief" by the 24 opposing party after the opposition and reply have been filed. The California Rules of Court and the 25 California Code of Civil Procedure contemplate that only moving papers (by the moving party), opposition 26 papers (by the opposing party), and reply papers (by the moving party) are allowed. (Cal. Rules of Court Rule 27 3.l 113(d); CCP § 1005.) A subsequent "reply" brief by the opposing party is not contemplated by these rules 28 and is not permitted. Plaintiff has not provided any authority for the filing of these subsequent "reply" briefs DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S UNAUTHORIZED REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER AND REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28