Preview
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Andrew Wolff, Esq. SBN 195092
Law Offices of Andrew Wolff, PC
1615 Broadway, 4th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
TELEPHONE NO.: 510-834-3300 FAX NO. (Optional): (510) 834-3377
E-MAIL ADDRESS: andrew@awolfflaw.com; info@awolfflaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs: Gwynn Kaliher, et al.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
STREET ADDRESS: 1225 Fallon Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 1225 Fallon Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Oakland, CA 94612
BRANCH NAME: René C. Davidson Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE RG21112157
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 01/24/2022 Time: 09:00 am Dept.: 24 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
1221 Oaks Street, Oakland, CA 94612
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Andrew Wolff, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs: Gwynn Kaliher, et al.
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/07/2021
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of Contract/Habitability
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
Plaintiffs suffered emotional distress and other damages as a result of residing in uninhabitable residential rental property
owned and/or controlled by Defendants.
(If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
5. Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request a jury triaI a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting a jury trial):
6. Trial date
a. The trial has been set for (date):
b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain):
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
See Attached
7. Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a. days (specify number): 5
b. hours (short causes) (specify):
8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following:
a. Attorney:
b. Firm:
c. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
e. E-mail address: g. Party represented:
Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
9. Preference
This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the
processes available through the court and community programs in this case.
(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided the ADR information package identified
in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
(2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
(1) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
statutory limit.
(2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
(3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 2 of 5
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157
10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or
have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR
processes (check all that apply): stipulation):
Mediation session not yet scheduled
Mediation session scheduled for (date):
(1) Mediation
Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
Mediation completed on (date):
Settlement conference not yet scheduled
(2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
Settlement conference completed on (date):
Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
(3) Neutral evaluation
Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
(4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
Private arbitration not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
Private arbitration completed on (date):
ADR session not yet scheduled
ADR session scheduled for (date):
(6) Other (specify):
Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
ADR completed on (date):
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 3 of 5
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157
11. Insurance
a. Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
b. Reservation of rights: Yes No
c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
12. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
Bankruptcy Other (specify):
Status:
13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
b. A motion to consolidate coordinate wiII be filed by (name party):
14. Bifurcation
The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
15. Other motions
The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
Motion in Limine
16. Discovery
a. The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Description Date
Plaintiff Deposition of Defendants May 2022
Plaintiff Written Discovery to Defendants Pending
c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
anticipated (specify):
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 4 of 5
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157
17. Economic litigation
a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):
18. Other issues
The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify):
19. Meet and confer
a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
to be done prior to hearing.
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
20. Total number of pages attached (if any):
I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: 01/06/2022
Andrew Wolff, Esq.
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
Additional signatures are attached.
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 5 of 5
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Attachment 6C.
Trial Dates
Date Case Name
03/07/2022 Weston v. Berhane RG19014409
03/18/2022 Toliver v. MIL-TECHS, INC RG20061088 D520
03/18/2022 Torgerson v. Payne RG20052722
03/18/2022 Toliver v. Mil-techs, Inc. RG20051795
03/28/2022 Turner v. The original Mel's Diner MSC20-00876
04/04/2022 Rockett v. Pitkin RG20070411
04/21/2022 Barnet v. Montagne Properties, LP CIV1901868
05/02/2022 Shelton v. Thomas RG20073065
05/06/2022 Tarver v. Xue RG19022697
05/09/2022 Oliver v. 2220 Tenth Avenue Associates RG20076295
05/13/2022 Enagbare v. Sun RG20063637
05/16/2022 Perez v. RMCW LLC RG19045976
05/16/2022 Davidson v. Zhu RG20074630
05/23/2022 Stevens v. Stan Kahan LLC RG19046299
06/06/2022 Sweet v. 1110 University ave., LLC RG19003195
06/13/2022 Smith v. Macintyre RG21089465
06/20/2022 Moreno v. Chew RG19025840
06/20/2022 Lucero v. Franciscan Apartments Alameda, LLC RG20081613
06/24/2022 Warhop v. William Byron Rumford, Sr. Plaza Associates
07/11/2022 Robinson v. Marr Sanchez & Associates RG20078853
07/11/2022 Barber-Burks v. Mary Investment Enterprise RG19043089
07/18/2022 Kheri v. Eugenie B. Young Trust RG20085259
07/18/2022 Pacheco v. Donnelly RG20084280
07/18/2022 Bhargava v. Koffman RG21088944
07/25/2022 Bauer v. Shah RG21087027
08/01/2022 Collins v. City of Oakland RG20058884
08/01/2022 Genochio v. Hayes Valley Apartments Limited Partnership, et al CGC-20-
588330
08/05/2022 Campbell v. City of Piedmont RG20061055
08/08/2022 Dorsey v. Sun Vally 50th Ave, LLC, 34-2019-00265758
08/08/2022 Rasheed v. Long RG21097331
09/02/2022 Blunt v. RHC-Oak2, LP RG20076288
09/12/2022 Kaur v. City of Berkeley RG20072001
09/12/2022 Ayala v. Ochoa RG21089591
09/12/2022 Bowen v. City and County of SF CGC-17-561849
09/12/2022 Chew v. KW Lake Merritt, LLC RG17882194
09/26/2022 Lewis v. Moore RG21086089
10/03/2022 Alba v. Vicochea RG19025986
10/10/2022 Earnest v. Moreno RG21105537
10/10/2022 Parfelkin v. Vogel RG20074841
10/10/2022 Brandy v. LJR Property Management LLC RG21100220
10/17/2022 KU v. NGUYEN RG21093611
10/17/2022 Bloom v. Fossel RG21101491
10/18/2022 Livingston vs. Wasatch Property Management, Inc. 34--2019-00263486
10/24/2022 Peters v. Micki’s Towing, Inc. RG20083501
10/28/2022 Denney v. Crossroads Village Mutual Housing association RG19038072
10/28/2022 Royal v. Elliott RG21100645
11/18/2022 Swoffard v. Vonmerta RG20083438
12/05/2022 Fitch v. Waterbury Properties, Inc. RG21086092
12/05/2022 Goldwasser v. Bouhedda RG20079625
12/05/2022 Oliver v. United Property Investment STK-CV-UBC-2021-0000065
12/19/2022 Livingston v. Chesapeake Apartment 34-2018-00226973
01/09/2023 Eppinger v. Ona RG21110386
01/20/2023 Sanders v. Tower of Faith Ministries RG21088806
01/23/2023 Adkins v. Potter RG21104187
01/23/2023 Nutile v. Agostini RG20074354
01/27/2023 Roberts v. Maxie RG21089470
02/06/2023 Vaughns v. East Bay Highland Palms II, LP RG21094860
02/06/2023 Garcia v. East Bay Capital Fund I, LP RG21087826
02/06/2023 Gonzalez v. 2228 Union Street Investors RG21092157
02/10/2023 Turner v. Bautista RG21093634
03/13/2023 Johnson v. Reyes RG21091523
03/27/2023 ANZURES V. NGUYEN RG19036699
04/10/2023 Dabit v. 888 Vermont G1 LP RG21103966
04/17/2023 Mhoon v. Jordan RG20061578
04/28/2023 Blackburn v. City of Oakland RG21091132
04/28/2023 Carter v. Kuang RG21102328
Preview
CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Andrew Wolff, Esq. SBN 195092 Law Offices of Andrew Wolff, PC 1615 Broadway, 4th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 TELEPHONE NO.: 510-834-3300 FAX NO. (Optional): (510) 834-3377 E-MAIL ADDRESS: andrew@awolfflaw.com; info@awolfflaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STREET ADDRESS: 1225 Fallon Street MAILING ADDRESS: 1225 Fallon Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Oakland, CA 94612 BRANCH NAME: René C. Davidson Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE RG21112157 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 01/24/2022 Time: 09:00 am Dept.: 24 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): 1221 Oaks Street, Oakland, CA 94612 Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Andrew Wolff, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/07/2021 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Breach of Contract/Habitability Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Plaintiffs suffered emotional distress and other damages as a result of residing in uninhabitable residential rental property owned and/or controlled by Defendants. (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request a jury triaI a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6. Trial date a. The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): See Attached 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. days (specify number): 5 b. hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. (3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 2 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR processes (check all that apply): stipulation): Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): (1) Mediation Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 3 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157 11. Insurance a. Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: Yes No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. A motion to consolidate coordinate wiII be filed by (name party): 14. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Motion in Limine 16. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date Plaintiff Deposition of Defendants May 2022 Plaintiff Written Discovery to Defendants Pending c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 4 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gwynn Kaliher, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 885 25th Avenue, LLC, et al. RG21112157 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): to be done prior to hearing. b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: 01/06/2022 Andrew Wolff, Esq. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] Page 5 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Attachment 6C. Trial Dates Date Case Name 03/07/2022 Weston v. Berhane RG19014409 03/18/2022 Toliver v. MIL-TECHS, INC RG20061088 D520 03/18/2022 Torgerson v. Payne RG20052722 03/18/2022 Toliver v. Mil-techs, Inc. RG20051795 03/28/2022 Turner v. The original Mel's Diner MSC20-00876 04/04/2022 Rockett v. Pitkin RG20070411 04/21/2022 Barnet v. Montagne Properties, LP CIV1901868 05/02/2022 Shelton v. Thomas RG20073065 05/06/2022 Tarver v. Xue RG19022697 05/09/2022 Oliver v. 2220 Tenth Avenue Associates RG20076295 05/13/2022 Enagbare v. Sun RG20063637 05/16/2022 Perez v. RMCW LLC RG19045976 05/16/2022 Davidson v. Zhu RG20074630 05/23/2022 Stevens v. Stan Kahan LLC RG19046299 06/06/2022 Sweet v. 1110 University ave., LLC RG19003195 06/13/2022 Smith v. Macintyre RG21089465 06/20/2022 Moreno v. Chew RG19025840 06/20/2022 Lucero v. Franciscan Apartments Alameda, LLC RG20081613 06/24/2022 Warhop v. William Byron Rumford, Sr. Plaza Associates 07/11/2022 Robinson v. Marr Sanchez & Associates RG20078853 07/11/2022 Barber-Burks v. Mary Investment Enterprise RG19043089 07/18/2022 Kheri v. Eugenie B. Young Trust RG20085259 07/18/2022 Pacheco v. Donnelly RG20084280 07/18/2022 Bhargava v. Koffman RG21088944 07/25/2022 Bauer v. Shah RG21087027 08/01/2022 Collins v. City of Oakland RG20058884 08/01/2022 Genochio v. Hayes Valley Apartments Limited Partnership, et al CGC-20- 588330 08/05/2022 Campbell v. City of Piedmont RG20061055 08/08/2022 Dorsey v. Sun Vally 50th Ave, LLC, 34-2019-00265758 08/08/2022 Rasheed v. Long RG21097331 09/02/2022 Blunt v. RHC-Oak2, LP RG20076288 09/12/2022 Kaur v. City of Berkeley RG20072001 09/12/2022 Ayala v. Ochoa RG21089591 09/12/2022 Bowen v. City and County of SF CGC-17-561849 09/12/2022 Chew v. KW Lake Merritt, LLC RG17882194 09/26/2022 Lewis v. Moore RG21086089 10/03/2022 Alba v. Vicochea RG19025986 10/10/2022 Earnest v. Moreno RG21105537 10/10/2022 Parfelkin v. Vogel RG20074841 10/10/2022 Brandy v. LJR Property Management LLC RG21100220 10/17/2022 KU v. NGUYEN RG21093611 10/17/2022 Bloom v. Fossel RG21101491 10/18/2022 Livingston vs. Wasatch Property Management, Inc. 34--2019-00263486 10/24/2022 Peters v. Micki’s Towing, Inc. RG20083501 10/28/2022 Denney v. Crossroads Village Mutual Housing association RG19038072 10/28/2022 Royal v. Elliott RG21100645 11/18/2022 Swoffard v. Vonmerta RG20083438 12/05/2022 Fitch v. Waterbury Properties, Inc. RG21086092 12/05/2022 Goldwasser v. Bouhedda RG20079625 12/05/2022 Oliver v. United Property Investment STK-CV-UBC-2021-0000065 12/19/2022 Livingston v. Chesapeake Apartment 34-2018-00226973 01/09/2023 Eppinger v. Ona RG21110386 01/20/2023 Sanders v. Tower of Faith Ministries RG21088806 01/23/2023 Adkins v. Potter RG21104187 01/23/2023 Nutile v. Agostini RG20074354 01/27/2023 Roberts v. Maxie RG21089470 02/06/2023 Vaughns v. East Bay Highland Palms II, LP RG21094860 02/06/2023 Garcia v. East Bay Capital Fund I, LP RG21087826 02/06/2023 Gonzalez v. 2228 Union Street Investors RG21092157 02/10/2023 Turner v. Bautista RG21093634 03/13/2023 Johnson v. Reyes RG21091523 03/27/2023 ANZURES V. NGUYEN RG19036699 04/10/2023 Dabit v. 888 Vermont G1 LP RG21103966 04/17/2023 Mhoon v. Jordan RG20061578 04/28/2023 Blackburn v. City of Oakland RG21091132 04/28/2023 Carter v. Kuang RG21102328