arrow left
arrow right
  • MUGDOCK TAVERN INVESTMENTS, et al  vs.  CAT SEATTLE LLC, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MUGDOCK TAVERN INVESTMENTS, et al  vs.  CAT SEATTLE LLC, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MUGDOCK TAVERN INVESTMENTS, et al  vs.  CAT SEATTLE LLC, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MUGDOCK TAVERN INVESTMENTS, et al  vs.  CAT SEATTLE LLC, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MUGDOCK TAVERN INVESTMENTS, et al  vs.  CAT SEATTLE LLC, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MUGDOCK TAVERN INVESTMENTS, et al  vs.  CAT SEATTLE LLC, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED DALLAS COUNTY 6/24/2015 2:08:52 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK CAUSE NO. DC-12-12887 MUGDOCK TAVERN § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF INVESTMENTS § and DUFFY I, LP, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § § CAT SEATTLE, LLC, ASCEND § HEALTH CORPORATION, and § RICHARD KRESCH, Individually, § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § Defendants and Counter- § Plaintiffs, § § v. § § DUFFY I, LP and JAMES P. § GRAHAM § § Counter-Defendants. § 134TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS COMES NOW Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs CAT Seattle, LLC, Ascend Health Corporation, and Richard Kresch (collectively, the “Ascend Defendants”) hereby file their Motion For Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and would show as follows: 1. A jury verdict was secured on the wiretapping counterclaim in this case after a full trial on the mertis. 2. The wiretapping counterclaim for which a jury finding was secured allows for the recovery of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees. 1 DAL 79504826v1 3. During the trial on the merits, and on the record, the parties decided and agreed, and the Court accepted and approved, that the award of any reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees would be tried to and decided by this Honorable Court. WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED the Ascend Defendants hereby request a hearing following which this Court grant any and all reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees (as well as taxable costs) that are proven following such hearing; and of course prayer is made for any and all relief legal and equitable to which the Ascend Defendants show themselves justly entitled. Date: June 24, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Victor D. Vital Victor D. Vital State Bar No. 00794798 vitalv@gtlaw.com Nicholas A. Sarokhanian State Bar No. 24075020 sarokhaniann@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5200 Dallas, Texas 75201 214-665-3600 - Telephone 214-665-3601- Facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS AND COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned certifies that counsel for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs have attempted to confer with Plaintiff to discuss this matter regarding the relief requested in this Motion, and Plaintiff has not responded. Thus, this matter is presented by this Motion. /s/ Victor D. Vital Victor D. Vital 2 DAL 79504826v1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the following instrument was served on the following counsel of record by electronic delivery on June 24, 2015: Charles C. Frederiksen Randy Brown Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C. 14801 Quorum Drive, Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75254 /s/ Victor D. Vital Victor Vital 3 DAL 79504826v1