Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2017-17619
Justin Jordan, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
Plaintiff §
§
VS. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
§
Vopak Terminal Deer Park Inc and §
Vopak North America Inc. (d/b/a §
Vopak Americas), §
Defendant § 129TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO VOPAK TERMINAL DEER PARK INC.
AND VOPAK NORTH AMERICA INC.’S
SUPPLEMENTAL PLEA IN ABATEMENT
Plaintiff, Justin Jordan, responds to the Vopak Defendants’ Supplemental
Plea in Abatement.
Introduction
Mere hours after Jordan filed his response to Defendants’ Motions for
Summary Judgment and to Abate, the Vopak Defendants filed a “supplemental”
Motion to Abate. The motion contains little new argument but seriously distorts the
law. Jordan agrees with Defendants that “Texas law is clear.” But unfortunately for
Defendants, the clear law of Texas supports Plaintiff’s position, not Defendants’.
Texas law is crystal clear that no abatement is required unless the Texas
Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has
exc…
