ANSWER OF PRO SE Party: BLAYLOCK, HEATHER R

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

                        

						    Preview
                        
                        
                          IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, STATE

OF FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

CASE # 14-010422-CO

 

 

DIVISION: 42
FEIGA/CLAIRMONT, L.P. a New York limited partnership, d/b/a BUENA VISTA I,
Plaintiff,
Vs. wn
Ss x7
a
ao
=e
= 42
= oe
Defendant 2 oS
Heemac BAY Lock. Soe

€ ye
ANSWER TO EVICTIONS SUMMONS/RESIDENTIALDefendant and Motion for paymayt plarrand..

termination of lease on February 14, 2015 (not earlier) so Defendant can provide housing for

herself and children and because Apartment Complex/Plaintiff is not valid in their claims.

(1) ANSWER as to why Defendant should not be forced to move. The amount and facts in
the complaint is incorrect. Defendant asked Plaintiff if Defendant could pay December

rent of $1080.36 on January 2, 2015, along with partial January rent that was due in the

amount of $1700.00 and the balance of $400 with the next check on 1/16/15. At that
time the January rent had just become due on January 1, 2015. Therefore, …