arrow left
arrow right
  • ALCH, GLORIA vs. GREAT IRISH PUBS FLORIDA INC, CA - Other document preview
  • ALCH, GLORIA vs. GREAT IRISH PUBS FLORIDA INC, CA - Other document preview
  • ALCH, GLORIA vs. GREAT IRISH PUBS FLORIDA INC, CA - Other document preview
						
                                

Preview

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA GLORIA ALCH, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 08-CA-0011215-0 GREAT IRISH PUBS FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a RAGLAN ROAD IRISH PUB AND RESTAURANT, Defendant. / MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Plaintiff, GLORIA ALCH (“Plaintiff”), by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby files her Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j). Plaintiff respectfully requests thirty (30) days from the Court’s Order granting this Motion to serve the Complaint on Defendant’s new registered agent. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court GRANT this Motion for the reasons stated below which constitute good cause shown: 1. On May 5, 2008, Plaintiff through attorney Jennifer Cintron, Esq. filed the Complaint in the above-captioned matter. 2. Attorney Cintron made arrangements to serve the Complaint on Defendant, Great Irish Pubs of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Ragland Road Irish Pub and Restaurant. 3. After the Complaint was filed but before it was served on Defendant, this case was transferred to undersigned counsel and the case file was forwarded from Daytona Beach to his office in Melbourne, Florida.4. However, the process server sent a letter to prior lead counsel in Daytona Beach after the case was transferred to undersigned counsel stating that service of process was not accomplished because Defendant changed registered agents and its prior agent had refused to accept service. The process server was not aware that undersigned counsel had taken over the case. 5. Undersigned counsel was not made aware of this letter until, November 5, 2008. 6. The 120-day service of process deadline expired on September 12, 2008. 7. Therefore, the instant Motion is necessary to enable Plaintiff to serve the Complaint. 8. Plaintiff has a 4-year statute of limitations to file her Complaint of disability discrimination and retaliation based on her January 2007 termination. 9. Therefore, were she to re-file her Complaint, it would still be timely. However, dismissing the Complaint to re-file same is not in the interest of judicial economy. 10. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j) states that if the Plaintiff shows “excusable neglect” for her omission (as is the case here) “the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for an additional thirty (30) days from the date of its order granting this Motion to serve the instant Complaint on Defendant. Plaintiff has attached a Proposed Order for the Court’s convenience.Dated this 6" day of November 2008. ‘ ‘A . Daniel A. Perez, Esquij Florida Bat No. 426903 Bogin, Munns & Munns, P.A. 924 Garfield St. Melbourne, Florida 32935 Tel: (321) 254-3939 Fax: (321) 254-3929 dperez@boginmunns.com Attomey for Plaintiff