On September 02, 2021 a
Appellate Materials
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
The People Of The State Of California,
for Misdemeanor Appeals
in the District Court of Fresno County.
Preview
I)
FREDERICK A. HURST, ESQ.
Bar No. 133248
State
P.0. Box 620362
[I L E
Las Vegas, Nevada 89162
0U 2 0 2021
Telephone: (818) 400-089]
Fax: (702) 221-3306
E-mail: fiedhurst@aol.com Y—‘Wfiu
Emé‘h'isfiW'B‘r‘ESEs‘fi'émm
Attorney for Appellant, Desmes Casanova Martinez
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF FRESNO
APPELLATE DIVISION
THE PEOPLE 0F THE STATE OF )Case No. 0002983
CALIFORNIA, )
) (Trial Court Case No.
Plaintifi' and Respondent, ) M209l9773)
)
v. ) APPLICATION FOR AN
) ORDER ALLOWING
DESMES CASANOVA MARTINEZ, ) APPELLATE DIVISION T0
) CONSIDER EXHIBIT
Defendant and Appellant. ) ON APPEAL;
) APPLICATION FOR AN
)EXTENSION OF TIME TO
) FILE APPELLANT’S
) OPENING BRIEF;
) DECLARATION OF
) FREDERICK A. HURST;
) ORDER
)
Appellant, Desmes Casanova Martinez, requests that this Court grant his
application for an order allowing the Appellate Division to consider Defendant’s
Exhibit A 0n this appeal, to wit, the videotape on Fresno Police oflicer, Craig
Howard’s, person.
Appellant fimher requests that this Court grant appellant’s application for
an extension of time to file Appellant’s Opening Brief. Appellant’s Opening
Brief, which is currently due on November 4, 202 l ,
will now be due thirty days
afier this Court has ruled on appellant’s Application for an Order Allowing
Appellate Division t0 Consider Exhibit on Appeal.
DATED: /y’/dz..)_7
Fred' A rst
DECLARATION OF FREDERICK A. HURST
I, FREDERICK A. HURST, declare:
l. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all courts of the State 0f
California I have personal knowledge 0f the facts set forth herein and, if called
upon t0 testify and placed under oath, I couId competently testify thereto.
2. I am the attorney of record for Appellant, Desmes Casanova Martinez, in
connection with his appeal of the tn'al coun’s ruling denying his motion to
suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, Fresno County Superior
Court Case No. M20919773.
3. I intend t0 argue on appeal that the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s
motion to suppress evidence. In order t0 argue this issue eflectively, Iwill need to
refer to Defendant’s Exhibit A, t0 wit, the videotape on Fresno Police officer,
Craig Howard’s, person. The videotape was played before the trial court at the
hearing on the motion t0 suppress. Itportrays Officer Howard’s interaction and
communication with appellant afier Oficer Howard performed a tmffic stop 0n
appellant and arrested him for suspected driving under the influence of marijuana.
Defendant’s Exhibit A is referred to on CT “14. Exhibit record filed 07/29/2021”
and CT “l6 Minute Order dated 07/29/2021.” Therefore, I request that this Court
grant appellant’s Application for an Order Allowing Appellate Division t0
Consider Exhibit 0n Appeal.
4. I further request that this Court grant appellant’s Application for an Extension
0f Time t0 File Appellant’s Opening Brief. Appellant’s Opening Brief, which is
3
currently due 0n November 4, 2021, will now be due thirty days afier this Court
has ruled on appellant’s Application for an Order Allowing Appellate Division to
Consider Exhibit on Appeal.
I declare under penalty of peljury that the foregoing istrue and correct.
Executed 0n October 18, 202] .
Fre erick A. urst
Document Filed Date
October 20, 2021
Case Filing Date
September 02, 2021
Category
Misdemeanor Appeals
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.