arrow left
arrow right
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
  • XXXXXMisdemeanor Appeals document preview
						
                                

Preview

I) FREDERICK A. HURST, ESQ. Bar No. 133248 State P.0. Box 620362 [I L E Las Vegas, Nevada 89162 0U 2 0 2021 Telephone: (818) 400-089] Fax: (702) 221-3306 E-mail: fiedhurst@aol.com Y—‘Wfiu Emé‘h'isfiW'B‘r‘ESEs‘fi'émm Attorney for Appellant, Desmes Casanova Martinez SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO APPELLATE DIVISION THE PEOPLE 0F THE STATE OF )Case No. 0002983 CALIFORNIA, ) ) (Trial Court Case No. Plaintifi' and Respondent, ) M209l9773) ) v. ) APPLICATION FOR AN ) ORDER ALLOWING DESMES CASANOVA MARTINEZ, ) APPELLATE DIVISION T0 ) CONSIDER EXHIBIT Defendant and Appellant. ) ON APPEAL; ) APPLICATION FOR AN )EXTENSION OF TIME TO ) FILE APPELLANT’S ) OPENING BRIEF; ) DECLARATION OF ) FREDERICK A. HURST; ) ORDER ) Appellant, Desmes Casanova Martinez, requests that this Court grant his application for an order allowing the Appellate Division to consider Defendant’s Exhibit A 0n this appeal, to wit, the videotape on Fresno Police oflicer, Craig Howard’s, person. Appellant fimher requests that this Court grant appellant’s application for an extension of time to file Appellant’s Opening Brief. Appellant’s Opening Brief, which is currently due on November 4, 202 l , will now be due thirty days afier this Court has ruled on appellant’s Application for an Order Allowing Appellate Division t0 Consider Exhibit on Appeal. DATED: /y’/dz..)_7 Fred' A rst DECLARATION OF FREDERICK A. HURST I, FREDERICK A. HURST, declare: l. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all courts of the State 0f California I have personal knowledge 0f the facts set forth herein and, if called upon t0 testify and placed under oath, I couId competently testify thereto. 2. I am the attorney of record for Appellant, Desmes Casanova Martinez, in connection with his appeal of the tn'al coun’s ruling denying his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, Fresno County Superior Court Case No. M20919773. 3. I intend t0 argue on appeal that the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. In order t0 argue this issue eflectively, Iwill need to refer to Defendant’s Exhibit A, t0 wit, the videotape on Fresno Police officer, Craig Howard’s, person. The videotape was played before the trial court at the hearing on the motion t0 suppress. Itportrays Officer Howard’s interaction and communication with appellant afier Oficer Howard performed a tmffic stop 0n appellant and arrested him for suspected driving under the influence of marijuana. Defendant’s Exhibit A is referred to on CT “14. Exhibit record filed 07/29/2021” and CT “l6 Minute Order dated 07/29/2021.” Therefore, I request that this Court grant appellant’s Application for an Order Allowing Appellate Division t0 Consider Exhibit 0n Appeal. 4. I further request that this Court grant appellant’s Application for an Extension 0f Time t0 File Appellant’s Opening Brief. Appellant’s Opening Brief, which is 3 currently due 0n November 4, 2021, will now be due thirty days afier this Court has ruled on appellant’s Application for an Order Allowing Appellate Division to Consider Exhibit on Appeal. I declare under penalty of peljury that the foregoing istrue and correct. Executed 0n October 18, 202] . Fre erick A. urst