arrow left
arrow right
  • Tarek El-Domeiri vs Peixue Li et al Small Claims $1501 - $5000  document preview
  • Tarek El-Domeiri vs Peixue Li et al Small Claims $1501 - $5000  document preview
  • Tarek El-Domeiri vs Peixue Li et al Small Claims $1501 - $5000  document preview
  • Tarek El-Domeiri vs Peixue Li et al Small Claims $1501 - $5000  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Cie SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA en MINUTE ORDER Tarek El-Domeiri vs Folden Enterprises, Inc. DBA: Silver Hearing Start Time 8:30 AM Creek Valley Properties et al Hearing Type: Claim: Plaintiff and 21SC085819 Defendant Date of Hearing: 10/05/2021 Comments: Line #06 Heard By: Copeland, Christine Location Department 15 Courtroom Reporter: Recording Electronic Courtroom Clerk Kathy Davidson Court Interpreter: Court Investigator: Parties Present: Future Hearings: El-Domeiri, Tarek Plaintiff Folden Enterprises, Inc. DBA: Defendant Silver Creek Valley Properties i Peixue Defendant Exhi its: - ER: 8:49 a.m.; 8:55 a.m. to 9:01 a.m. The PLAINTIFF / TENANT / TAREK EL-DOMEIRI appears and is sworn to testify. Lisa Goodman, A Property Manager, appears and is sworn to testify on behalf of the named DEFENDANT/ FOLDEN ENTERPRISES, INC., [ DBA: SILVER CREEK VALLEY PROPERTIES ]. The DEFENDANT/ LANDLORD/ PEIXUE LI appears and needs the assistance of a MANDARIN interpreter. Upon initial examination ofa residential LEASE, the COURT finds that the PLAINTIFF / TENANT has sued the WRONG defendant, a property management company. The COURT therefore DISMISSES the defendant [ Folden Enterprises, Inc., Dba: Silver Creek Valley Properties ], as an improper defendant, WITH PREJUDICE, as stated on the record. Upon further examination of said residential lease, the COURT finds that there are actully two LANDLORDS listed. The PROPER / DEFENDANTS = The LANDLORDS = >>> [FANG HU and PEIXUE LI ]**** Printed: 10/5/2021 10/05/2021 Claim: Plaintiff and Defendant - 21SC085819 Page 1 of 2 Cie SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA en MINUTE ORDER In order to proceed with this action, the PLAINTIFF must [ AMEND ] his complaint to include the proper defendants/ landlords, + [SERVE ]. Awritten ORDER OF COURT is issued to this effect, with file stamped copies of said order served to the parties in open court. PLAINTIFF may [RESET] this matter in the Clerk's Office, during normal business hours. It is noted that a [ MANDARIN INTERPRETER] will need to be requested for the [ Defendants / Landlords ], once the plaintiff has amended his complaint. Printed: 10/5/2021 10/05/2021 Claim: Plaintiff and Defendant - 21SC085819 Page 2 of 2