On June 05, 2014 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
David Confeiteiro,
and
Gelco Corporation,
Tatiana Mezarina-Rojas,
The Nielsen Company,
for V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
in the District Court of Fairfield County.
Preview
DOCKET NO. FBT-CV14-6043491-S : SUPERIOR COURT
DAVID CONFEITEIRO : J.D. OF FAIRFIELD
V : AT BRIDGEPORT
TATIANA MEZARINA-ROJAS ET AL : OCTOBER 12, 2016
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
The undersigned Defendants request the Court to Reconsider the Motion for Trial
Continuance filed by agreement of the parties on 9/21/16. The purpose of this Motion is to more
fully set forth the issues that need to be addressed before a fair and equitable Trial can occur. In
support of this Motion, the Defendants states:
1. The parties, the undersigned and Plaintiff Trial counsel, who entered into case in March
2016, have made good faith efforts to exchange necessary information and have this
case involving complex damage issues, prepared for a fair trial to both sides. Despite
those efforts, issue remain that require a short delay in the Trial of this case.
2. The Parties have agree to try and resolve the case through Mediation with the Honorable
Judge Freedman, on 10/24/2016. In addition to a focus on preparing for this event, the
complexity of the claims and ongoing new information becoming available may require
follow up discussions, extending the Mediation for a period of 1-2 weeks.
3. The Plaintiff is scheduled to undergo a neurological IME on 10/13, based on the
Defendant’s receipt of Plaintiff’s neurologist records prior to the subject loss on
8/29/16 followed by a deposition of the treating neurologist, Dr. Sena on 9/8/2016.
We would expect an IME Report by 10/24 followed by an Expert Disclosure, and if
desired, a deposition by Plaintiff counsel and ability to have a Plaintiff Expert address
the IME findings.
4. A large part of the Plaintiff’s case is based on a lost earning capacity claim. The
defendant was only provided disclosure of full relevant tax returns as of 10/7/2016 and
has yet to be provided with employment records (authorization provided on 10/7).
Despite non receipt of records by Defendants, the Plaintiff on 9/7/2016 disclosed an
economist expected to testify on issues not disclosed to the Defendants, while the
Defendants have filed appropriate Motion in Limine/Preclusion regarding the lost
earning capacity claims, Defendants would have no dispute with the claims so long as
they have an adequate opportunity to obtain all relevant information and the opportunity
to retain a countering Expert.
WHEREFORE, the Defendants move that the agreed upon Motion for Trial Continuance
be Reconsidered and Granted in the interests of fundamental fairness to both parties in the case.
THE DEFENDANTS,
By 408236
Alan S. Tobin
Law Offices of Meehan, Roberts, Turret &
Rosenbaum
108 Leigus Road, 1st Floor
Wallingford, CT 06492
Telephone: 203-294-7800
Juris # 408308
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that all personal identifying information was redacted pursuant to Practice
Book Section 4-7. This will further certify the foregoing was mailed via U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid
or electronically delivered pursuant to Practice Book Section 10-14 on this 12th day of October,
2016.
Attorney for Pltf
Joseph S. Dobrowolski, Esq.
51 Elm Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Law Offices of Paul Farren Jr.
129 Whitney Avenue
New Haven, CT 06510
408236
Alan S. Tobin
Commissioner of Superior Court
Document Filed Date
October 12, 2016
Case Filing Date
June 05, 2014
Category
V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.