On June 05, 2014 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
David Confeiteiro,
and
Gelco Corporation,
Tatiana Mezarina-Rojas,
The Nielsen Company,
for V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
in the District Court of Fairfield County.
Preview
CV 15-14-6043491 S SUPERIOR COURT
DAVID CONFEITEIRO J. D. OF FAIRFIELD
V AT BRIDGEPORT
TATIANA MEZARINA-ROJAS, ET AL AUGUST 3, 2015
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
The plaintiff, DAVID CONFEITEIRO, hereby requests a30 days of time within
which to respond to the defendant’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT dated
July 27, 2015.
The additional time is needed to accurately research and respond to said MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
The plaintiffs further represents that this matter is assigned for jury trial July 12, 2016.
THE PLAINTIFF
___________________/015768/
Joseph S. Dobrowolski
51 Elm St.
New Haven, CT 06510
His attorney (203)787-1293
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
ORDER
The foregoing motion, having been presented to this court, it is hereby
ORDERED; GRANTED/DENIED
BY THE COURT
__________________________________
Judge/Clerk
CERTIFICATION
Copies of the foregoing have been mailed to all counsel of record on this 3rd day of August,
2015,
___________________________/015768/
Joseph S. Dobrowolski
Alan S. Tobin, Esq.
Law Offices of Meehan, Turret & Rosenbaum
108 Leigus Rd. 1st floor
Wallingford, CT 06492
Document Filed Date
August 03, 2015
Case Filing Date
June 05, 2014
Category
V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CV 15-14-6043491 S SUPERIOR COURT DAVID CONFEITEIRO J. D. OF FAIRFIELD V AT BRIDGEPORT TATIANA MEZARINA-ROJAS, ET AL AUGUST 3, 2015 MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME The plaintiff, DAVID CONFEITEIRO, hereby requests a30 days of time within which to respond to the defendant’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT dated July 27, 2015. The additional time is needed to accurately research and respond to said MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The plaintiffs further represents that this matter is assigned for jury trial July 12, 2016. THE PLAINTIFF ___________________/015768/ Joseph S. Dobrowolski 51 Elm St. New Haven, CT 06510 His attorney (203)787-1293 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED ORDER The foregoing motion, having been presented to this court, it is hereby ORDERED; GRANTED/DENIED BY THE COURT __________________________________ Judge/Clerk CERTIFICATION Copies of the foregoing have been mailed to all counsel of record on this 3rd day of August, 2015, ___________________________/015768/ Joseph S. Dobrowolski Alan S. Tobin, Esq. Law Offices of Meehan, Turret & Rosenbaum 108 Leigus Rd. 1st floor Wallingford, CT 06492