On September 17, 2014 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Discover Bank,
and
Nicholas Tarasov,
for C40 - Contracts - Collections
in the District Court of Litchfield County.
Preview
RET: SEPTEMBER 23,2014 SUPERIOR COURT
DISCOVER BANK —
JD OF LITCHFIELD
vs. t AT LITCHFIELD
NICHOLAS TARASOV Opdey 25,2014
COMPLAINT %g'%
Count I (Default on Credit Account)
1 On or before APRIL 30,2014, the defendant became indebted
to the plaintiff in the sum of $13,108.41 for use
of credit account number #HH#H#HHHHHHH2578
issued by the plaintiff.
Despite demand, the balance of $13,108.41 remains
wholly unpaid and the defendant failed and continues
to fail to make payment in full.
The Plaintiff requests that no post-judgment interest be
awarded.
count II (Account Stated)
4 Plaintiff hereby incorporates paragraphs 1-3 of Count I
as though set forth in full herein.
The defendant had a credit account with the plaintiff,
and in connection with that account, plaintiff mailed,
delivered, sent or otherwise transmitted periodic
account statements to the defendant setting forth all of
the charges and credits applicable to the account, as well
as the balance due.
Upon information and belief, the defendant received and held
these statements for an unreasonabl e time with no known
protest or known notice of defects to the plaintiff as to
the charges and amounts due.
The final statement transmitted to the defendant, indicating
a balance due and owing, was accepted and held by the
defendant for an unreasonable time without protest or notice
of defect.
8 The plaintiff seeks damages for the account stated balance
minus any credit(s) on the account occuring after the
last statement was transmitted.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the defendant that the plaintiff
intends to seek satisfaction of any judgment endered in
plaintiff's favor in this action from any debt accruing to the
defendant by reason of the defendant's personal services.
STATEMENT OF AMOUNT IN DEMAND
The amount, legal interest, or property in
demand, exclusive of interest and costs, is
greater than $5,000.00 but less than $15,000.00
The remedy sought is based upon an express or
implied promise to pay a definite sum.
THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS:
1. Money damages; and
2 Costs of suit.
Dated at East Hartford, Connecticut Que 2014 .
Holly R. Nelen, Esq.
Law Offices Howard Lee Schiff, B.C
Juris No, 419040
510 Tolland Street
POB 280245
E Hartford cT 06128-0245
(860) 528-9991
THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR.
nk
CN-Â¥25256
Document Filed Date
September 17, 2014
Case Filing Date
September 17, 2014
Category
C40 - Contracts - Collections
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.