arrow left
arrow right
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
  • COUNTY OF NUECES vs. PURDUE PHARMA L P MDL - Opioid Litigation document preview
						
                                

Preview

County of Nueces § IN THE COUNTY COURT , § § v. § AT LAW NO. 4 § PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., § § NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT N § 152nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ALLERGAN SALES, LLC’S ORIGINAL ANSWER TO PLAINT TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Defendant Allergan Sales, LLC files this Answer to Plaintiff’s Original Petition. General Denial allegations in the Petition in accordance e 92. Allergan Sales, LLC demands strict proof of all allegations made by Plaintiff, all as require Plea to the Jurisdiction Plaintiff’s claims are barred because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and s for subject matter jurisdiction. Affirmative and Other Defenses Without assuming any burden of proof that it otherwise would not bear or admitting that it is in any way liable to Plaintiff, Allergan Sales, LLC asserts that Plaintiff’s claims against it are barred pursuant to the following defenses, each of which is raised in the alternative. Allergan Sales, LLC expressly reserves the right to amend these defenses as permitted by the Texas Rules Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by its failure to mitigate damages. Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the injury it alleges was the result of one or more crimin Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the learned intermediary Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines of waiver, Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the First Amendment commercial and political speech. The warnings and information that accompanied Allergan Sales, LLC’s products were approved by the FDA for a product approved under the FDCA and/or otherwise meet the presumption requirements in Section 82.007 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 82.007(a) (West 2011). 2 The claims asserted in the Petition are barred and/or reduced by the assumption of risk, informed consent, contributory or comparative negligence, contributory or comparative fault, Plaintiff’s injuries and damages, if any, are barred in whole or in part by the actions, omissions, and/or conduct of third parties over whom Allergan Sales, LLC had no control or authority and, thus, any recovery should be reduced or barred by such parties’ proportionate fault. Any verdict or judgment that might be recovered by Plaintiff must be reduced by those amounts that have already or will in the future, with reasonable certainty, indemnify Plaintiff in whole or in part for any past or future claimed economic loss from any collateral source such as compensation, or employee benefit program. Allergan Sales, LLC’s liability, if any, will not result from its conduct but is solely the result of an obligation imposed by law, and thus Allergan Sales, LLC is entitled to complete indemnity, express or imp Plaintiff’s claims are barred because they are preempted by federal law. Plaintiff’s claims violate the Supremacy Cl Plaintiff’s claims are barred in whole or in part by the deference that federal and on law give to discretionary actions by the FDA under the FDCA and regulations promulgated under the FDCA. To the extent Plaintiff’s claims are based on alleged misrepresentations made to the FDA, such claims are barred pursuant to Buckman Co. v. Plaintiff’s Legal Committee Plaintiff cannot state a claim with regard to warnings and labeling for products because the remedy sought by Plaintiff is subject to the exclusive regulation of the FDA. 3 Plaintiff’s claims regarding warnings and labeling are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, in that the FDA is charged under the law with determining the Plaintiff’s claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are barred or limited by the economic loss rule. Allergan Sales, LLC’s rights under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution are violated by any financial or other arrangement that might distort a government attorney’s duty to pursue justice rather than his or her personal interests, financial or otherwise, in the context of a civil enforcement proceeding. Plaintiff’s claim for exemplary/punitive damages is subject to the following limitations: (a) Chapter 41 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, including the cap on exemplary damages set out in Section 41.008 of that Code; and (b) the limits of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, as those limits have been applied by st courts to restrict exemplary damages. Plaintiff’s claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are barred under the municipal cost If Plaintiff has sustained any injuries or damages, such were the result of intervening or superseding events, factors, occurrences or conditions, which were not reasonably foreseeable and in no way caused by Allergan Sales, LLC and for which Allergan Sales, LLC is Plaintiff’s claims and damages are barred or limited, in whole or in part, by common law, statutory, and state constitutional constraints on the exercise of police powers by a 4 The claims asserted in the Petition are barred, reduced, and/or limited pursuant to applicable statutory and common law regarding limitations of awards, caps on recovery, and setoffs. Plaintiff’s claims are barred because its alleged loss, damage, injury, harm, expense, diminution, or deprivation, if any, was caused in whole or in part by Plaintiff’s ratification of Allergan Sales, LLC’s allegedly deceptive or misleading conduct. Should Allergan Sales, LLC be held liable to Plaintiff, which liability is specifically denied, Allergan Sales, LLC would be entitled to a set-off for all sums of money received or for the same injuries alleged in the Petition. Plaintiff’s claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are not properly joined with Plaintiff’s claims against the other defendants in this case because the claims do not arise out of the same alleged statements, actions, and omissions by all defendants in the case. Plaintiff has failed to join one or more necessary and indispensable parties, including without limitation health care providers, prescribers, patients, whom Plaintiff alleges engaged in the unauthorized or illicit prescription, dispensing, diversion, Plaintiff’s claims are barred for parens patriae other authority to bring the claims alleged, and to Plaintiff by Allergan Sales, LLC. Plaintiff’s fraud claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are barred because they fail to allege any material misrepresentation made by Allergan Sales, LLC. As a matter of Texas law, Plaintiff is not entitled to a declaratory judgment, for these alleged claims. 5 Allergan Sales, LLC may assert other defenses that become available or appear during the course of additional investigation or discovery in this case. Allergan Sales, LLC reserves the right to amend this answer to assert any such defense, consistent with the Texas Rules Allergan Sales, LLC demands a jury trial and tenders the appropriate fee with this answer. Allergan Sales, LLC prays that the Court dismiss the claims against it with prejudice, enter a final take-nothing judgment in its favor, award it attorneys’ fees and costs, and grant such other to which it is entitled. 6 Dated: February 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Wesley Hill Wesley Hill Brett F. Miller WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC 1507 Bill Owens Parkway Facsimile: (903) 757-2323 wh@wsfirm.com bmiller@wsfirm.com Donna Welch, P.C. Timothy W. Knapp rothm@kirkland.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served via the Court’s electronic filing system on all counse /s/ Wesley Hill Wesley Hill