On October 23, 2018 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
County Of Nueces,
Nueces County Hospital District,
and
Abbvie Inc,
Actavis Inc,
Actavis Laboratories Ut Inc,
Actavis Llc,
Actavis Pharma Inc,
Actavis Plc,
Advanced Pharma Inc,
Allergan Finance Llc (F K A Actavis Inc F K A Watson Pharmaceuticals,
Allergan Plc,
Allergan Sales Llc,
Allergan Usa Inc,
Amerisourcebergen Corporation,
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation,
Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., F K A Depomed Inc.,
Avella Of Houston,
Cardinal Health 105 Inc,
Cardinal Health 108 Llc,
Cardinal Health 110 Llc,
Cardinal Health 112 Llc,
Cardinal Health 200 Llc,
Cardinal Health 414 Llc,
Cardinal Health Inc,
Cephalon Inc,
Depomed Inc,
Endo Health Solutions Inc,
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Insys Manufacturing Llc,
Insys Therapeutics Inc,
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc,
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc (F K A Ortho-Mcneil-Janssen,
Johnson & Johnson,
Knoll Pharmaceutical Company,
Mallinckrodt Llc,
Mallinckrodt Plc,
Mckesson Corporation,
Mckesson Medical-Surgical Inc,
Mission Pharmacal Company,
Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Mylan Inc,
Mylan Institutional Inc,
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Mylan Specialty L P,
Noramco Inc,
Ortho-Mcneil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L P,
Purdue Pharma Inc,
Purdue Pharma L P,
Purdue Pharma Manufacturing L P,
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd,
Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa Inc,
The Purdue Frederick Company,
The Purdue Frederick Company Inc,
Watson Laboratories Inc,
Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Watson Pharma Inc,
for MDL - Opioid Litigation
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
County of Nueces § IN THE COUNTY COURT
, §
§
v. § AT LAW NO. 4
§
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., §
§ NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
§ IN THE DISTRICT COURT
N § 152nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
§ HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ALLERGAN SALES, LLC’S
ORIGINAL ANSWER TO PLAINT
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
Defendant Allergan Sales, LLC files this Answer to Plaintiff’s Original Petition.
General Denial
allegations in the Petition in accordance
e 92. Allergan Sales, LLC demands strict proof of all allegations
made by Plaintiff, all as require
Plea to the Jurisdiction
Plaintiff’s claims are barred because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and
s for subject matter jurisdiction.
Affirmative and Other Defenses
Without assuming any burden of proof that it otherwise would not bear or admitting that it
is in any way liable to Plaintiff, Allergan Sales, LLC asserts that Plaintiff’s claims against it are
barred pursuant to the following defenses, each of which is raised in the alternative. Allergan
Sales, LLC expressly reserves the right to amend these defenses as permitted by the Texas Rules
Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the applicable statute of
limitations.
Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by its failure to mitigate damages.
Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the injury it alleges was
the result of one or more crimin
Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the learned intermediary
Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines of waiver,
Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the First Amendment
commercial and political speech.
The warnings and information that accompanied Allergan Sales, LLC’s products
were approved by the FDA for a product approved under the FDCA and/or otherwise meet the
presumption requirements in Section 82.007 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 82.007(a) (West 2011).
2
The claims asserted in the Petition are barred and/or reduced by the assumption of
risk, informed consent, contributory or comparative negligence, contributory or comparative fault,
Plaintiff’s injuries and damages, if any, are barred in whole or in part by the actions,
omissions, and/or conduct of third parties over whom Allergan Sales, LLC had no control or
authority and, thus, any recovery should be reduced or barred by such parties’ proportionate fault.
Any verdict or judgment that might be recovered by Plaintiff must be reduced by
those amounts that have already or will in the future, with reasonable certainty, indemnify Plaintiff
in whole or in part for any past or future claimed economic loss from any collateral source such as
compensation, or employee benefit program.
Allergan Sales, LLC’s liability, if any, will not result from its conduct but is solely
the result of an obligation imposed by law, and thus Allergan Sales, LLC is entitled to complete
indemnity, express or imp
Plaintiff’s claims are barred because they are preempted by federal law.
Plaintiff’s claims violate the Supremacy Cl
Plaintiff’s claims are barred in whole or in part by the deference that federal and
on law give to discretionary actions by the FDA
under the FDCA and regulations promulgated under the FDCA.
To the extent Plaintiff’s claims are based on alleged misrepresentations made to the
FDA, such claims are barred pursuant to Buckman Co. v. Plaintiff’s Legal Committee
Plaintiff cannot state a claim with regard to warnings and labeling for products
because the remedy sought by Plaintiff is subject to the exclusive regulation of the FDA.
3
Plaintiff’s claims regarding warnings and labeling are barred in whole or in part by
the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, in that the FDA is charged under the law with determining the
Plaintiff’s claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are barred or limited by the economic
loss rule.
Allergan Sales, LLC’s rights under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution
are violated by any financial or other arrangement that might distort a government attorney’s duty
to pursue justice rather than his or her personal interests, financial or otherwise, in the context of
a civil enforcement proceeding.
Plaintiff’s claim for exemplary/punitive damages is subject to the following
limitations: (a) Chapter 41 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, including the cap on
exemplary damages set out in Section 41.008 of that Code; and (b) the limits of the Due Process
Clause of the United States Constitution, as those limits have been applied by st
courts to restrict exemplary damages.
Plaintiff’s claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are barred under the municipal cost
If Plaintiff has sustained any injuries or damages, such were the result of
intervening or superseding events, factors, occurrences or conditions, which were not reasonably
foreseeable and in no way caused by Allergan Sales, LLC and for which Allergan Sales, LLC is
Plaintiff’s claims and damages are barred or limited, in whole or in part, by
common law, statutory, and state constitutional constraints on the exercise of police powers by a
4
The claims asserted in the Petition are barred, reduced, and/or limited pursuant to
applicable statutory and common law regarding limitations of awards, caps on recovery, and
setoffs.
Plaintiff’s claims are barred because its alleged loss, damage, injury, harm,
expense, diminution, or deprivation, if any, was caused in whole or in part by Plaintiff’s ratification
of Allergan Sales, LLC’s allegedly deceptive or misleading conduct.
Should Allergan Sales, LLC be held liable to Plaintiff, which liability is specifically
denied, Allergan Sales, LLC would be entitled to a set-off for all sums of money received or
for the same injuries alleged in the Petition.
Plaintiff’s claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are not properly joined with
Plaintiff’s claims against the other defendants in this case because the claims do not arise out of
the same alleged statements, actions, and omissions by all defendants in the case.
Plaintiff has failed to join one or more necessary and indispensable parties,
including without limitation health care providers, prescribers, patients,
whom Plaintiff alleges engaged in the unauthorized or illicit prescription, dispensing, diversion,
Plaintiff’s claims are barred for parens patriae
other authority to bring the claims alleged, and
to Plaintiff by Allergan Sales, LLC.
Plaintiff’s fraud claims against Allergan Sales, LLC are barred because they fail to
allege any material misrepresentation made by Allergan Sales, LLC.
As a matter of Texas law, Plaintiff is not entitled to a declaratory judgment,
for these alleged claims.
5
Allergan Sales, LLC may assert other defenses that become available or appear
during the course of additional investigation or discovery in this case. Allergan Sales, LLC
reserves the right to amend this answer to assert any such defense, consistent with the Texas Rules
Allergan Sales, LLC demands a jury trial and tenders the appropriate fee with this
answer.
Allergan Sales, LLC prays that the Court dismiss the claims against it with prejudice, enter
a final take-nothing judgment in its favor, award it attorneys’ fees and costs, and grant such other
to which it is entitled.
6
Dated: February 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Wesley Hill
Wesley Hill
Brett F. Miller
WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC
1507 Bill Owens Parkway
Facsimile: (903) 757-2323
wh@wsfirm.com
bmiller@wsfirm.com
Donna Welch, P.C.
Timothy W. Knapp
rothm@kirkland.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served via the Court’s
electronic filing system on all counse
/s/ Wesley Hill
Wesley Hill