On April 21, 2021 a Motion,Ex Parte was filed involving a dispute between Nancy Burton, and Bryan Hurlburt,Commissioner,Ct Dept Of Agriculture, Building Department, Town Of Redding Ct, Charles Dellarocco, Animal Control Officer,Ct Dept. Of Agriculture, David Philip Mason, Dennis Gibbon, Department Of Agriculture,State Of Connecticut, Elinore Carmody, Health Department,Town Of Redding Ct Town Hall,Redding, Julia Pemberton First Selectman,Town Or Redding, Mark O'Donnell Chief Of Police, Police Department,Town Of Redding Ct Town Hall, Susan Winters, Town Of Redding,Connecticut C O Town Clerk, for M00 - Misc - Injunction in the District Court of New Haven County.
October 15, 2021
April 21, 2021
M00 - Misc - Injunction
154 HIGHLAND AVE Attorney for the Plaintiff
BRYAN HURLBURT,COMMISSIONER,CT DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Defendant
BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF REDDING CT Defendant
CHARLES DELLAROCCO, ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER,CT DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Defendant
CHRISTINE N PARISE Attorney for the Defendant
DANIEL MATTHEW SALTON Attorney for the Defendant
DAVID PHILIP MASON Defendant
DENNIS GIBBON Defendant
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,STATE OF CONNECTICUT Defendant
ELINORE CARMODY Defendant
HEALTH DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF REDDING CT TOWN HALL,REDDING Defendant
HOWD & LUDORF LLC Attorney for the Defendant
JONATHAN EDWARD HARDING Attorney for the Defendant
JOSEPH P QUINN JR Attorney
JULIA PEMBERTON FIRST SELECTMAN,TOWN OR REDDING Defendant
KARSTEN & TALLBERG LLC Attorney for the Defendant
MARK O'DONNELL CHIEF OF POLICE Defendant
MATTHEW I LEVINE Attorney for the Defendant
NANCY BURTON Plaintiff
PHV RISEBERG MICHAEL D 1/13/10 Attorney for the Defendant
PHV STANHILL DAVID B 2/22/22 Attorney for the Defendant
POLICE DEPARTMENT,TOWN OF REDDING CT TOWN HALL Defendant
PULLMAN & COMLEY LLC Attorney for the Defendant
ROBERT SCOTT HILLSON Attorney for the Defendant
SUSAN WINTERS Defendant
TOWN OF REDDING,CONNECTICUT C/O TOWN CLERK Defendant
WILL HASKELL NONPARTY DEPONENT Witness
CAROLE BRIGGS Attorney
Philip Newbury Attorney
Kimberly Bosse Attorney
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
DOCKET NO. (X06) UWY-CV21-5028294-S NANCY BURTON : SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff : : COMPLEX LITIGATION v. : DOCKET : AT WATERBURY DAVID PHILIP MASON, Et Al. : Defendants : OCTOBER 15, 2021 OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION (ENTRY NO. 222.00) Defendants, State of Connecticut Department of Agriculture (“Department”), Bryan P. Hurlburt, Commissioner of Agriculture (“Commissioner”), and Charles DellaRocco, State Animal Control Officer (hereinafter referred to collectively as “State Defendants”) hereby object to Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification – Court Order (Entry No. 222.00). Plaintiff seeks clarification of the order of the Court (Entry No. 191.20; Bellis, J.) denying her Motion for Order – Leave to Serve (Entry No. 191.00), on September 30, 2021. 1 Motions for interpretation or clarification are commonly considered by courts and may be granted at the discretion of the court. See Clark v. Clark, 150 Conn. App. 551, 570 (2014) (citing Holcombe v. Holcombe, 22 Conn. App. 363, 366, 576 A.2d 1317 (1990). "[T]he purpose of a clarification is to take a prior statement, decision or order and make it easier to understand. Motions for clarification, therefore, may be appropriate where there is an ambiguous term in a judgment or decision.” Bologna v. Bologna, Docket No. AC 43848, 2021 Conn. App. LEXIS 357, at *17 (App. Oct. 1, 2021) (quoting Almeida v. Almeida, 190 Conn. App. 760, 765-67 1 In fact, Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification actually seeks to solicit guidance from the court “to inform Plaintiff as to what step(s) to take” to provide the Court with personal jurisdiction upon two State Defendants in their individual capacity. (2019). The Court unambiguously denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Order. There is no clarification warranted as there cannot be an alternate interpretation of the Court’s order that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order be “DENIED.” (Entry No. 191.20; Bellis, J.). For all the foregoing reasons, this Motion for Clarification should be DENIED. DEFENDANTS STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BRYAN P. HURLBURT, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE CHARLES DELLAROCCO, STATE ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER WILLIAM TONG ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ___434270_____________________________ Jonathan E. Harding Assistant Attorney General Juris No. 434270 165 Capitol Ave. Hartford, CT 06106 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the forgoing Objection was delivered electronically to the following counsel and self-represented parties October 15, 2021: Nancy Burton 154 Highland Ave. Rowayton, CT 06853 NancyBurtonCT@aol.com Robert Scott Hillson, Esq. 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109 rhillson@rubinrudman.com Philip T. Newbury, Jr., Esq. Howd & Ludorf, LLC 65 Wethersfield Avenue Hartford, CT 06114 pnewbury@hl-law.com Steve Stafstrom, Esq. Pullman & Comley, LLC 850 Main Street, P.O. Box 7006 Bridgeport, CT 06601 sstafstrom@pullcom.com James N. Tallberg, Esq. Kimberly A. Bosse, Esq. Karsten & Tallberg, LLC 500 Enterprise Dr., Suite 4B Rocky Hill, CT 06067 jtallberg@kt-lawfirm.com kbosse@kt-lawfirm.com Alexander William Ahrens, Esq. Melick & Porter, LLC 900 Main Street South Suite 102 Southbury, CT 06488 ____434270_________________________ Jonathan E. Harding Commissioner of the Superior Court