arrow left
arrow right
  • KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, et al  vs.  TEN-X, INC., et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, et al  vs.  TEN-X, INC., et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, et al  vs.  TEN-X, INC., et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, et al  vs.  TEN-X, INC., et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, et al  vs.  TEN-X, INC., et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, et al  vs.  TEN-X, INC., et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-21-03824 MADISON TITLE AGENCY, LLC, IN THE DISTRICT COURT §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ Plaintiff, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS TEN-X, INC., KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, MHNC MEYERS, LLC, SMHNC MEYERS, LLC, YKHKNC MEYERS, LLC, and YTNC MEYERS, LLC, Defendants. 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CAUSE NO. DC-21-03974 KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC, § MHNC MEYERS, LLC, SMHNC § MEYERS, LLC, YKHKNC MEYERS, § LLC, and YTNC MEYERS, LLC, § § § o I Plamnffs’ (Consolidated with Cause No. DC-21—03824) g § § § TEN-X, INC. and MADISON TITLE § AGENCY, LLC, § § Defendants. § ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TEN-X INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE KAZ MEYERS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMSl 1 As used herein, the “Kaz Meyers Plaintiffs” shall mean and refer to: (1) Kaz Meyers Properties, LLC; (2) MHNC Meyers, LLC; (3) SMHNC Meyers, LLC; (4) YKHKNC Meyers, LLC; and (5) YTNC Meyers, LLC, collectively. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TEN-X INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE KAZ MEYERS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS - Page 1 On this day, came to be considered the Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant Ten-X, Inc. (“Ten-X”). After considering the Motion, the response filed by the Kaz Meyers Plaintiffs (if any), the reply filed by Ten-X (if any), the arguments of counsel, and any evidence properly before the Court, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is hereby GRANTED and (2) all claims asserted by the Kaz Meyers Plaintiffs against Ten-X are DISMISSED with prejudice to re-filling within the State of Texas. SIGNED this day of , 2021. The Honorable Judge Eric V. Moyé 14m Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TEN-X INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE KAZ MEYERS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS - Page 2 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Leita Gable on behalf of Stephen Huschka Bar No. 24097861 lag@kesslercollins.com Envelope ID: 56747742 Status as of 8/30/2021 9:01 AM CST Associated Case Party: KAZ MEYERS PROPERTIES, LLC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Eric Wood eric@brownfoxlaw.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Associated Case Party: TEN-X, INC. Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Angie Stevenson astevenson@kesslercollins.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Gary S.Kess|er gsk@kesslercollins.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Stephen JHuschka shuschka@kesslercollins.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Leita Gable lgable@kesslercollins.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Samuel Kessler skessler@kesslercollins.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Tonya C.Stephenson tstephenson@bellnunnally.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Susan Shores sshores@bellnunnally.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Associated Case Party: MADISON TITLE AGENCY, LLC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Parker Burns pburns@bellnunnally.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT Kartik R.Singapura ksingapura@bellnunnally.com 8/27/2021 4:50:07 PM SENT