arrow left
arrow right
  • THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. SAMUEL GARCIAWrit of Habeas Corpus document preview
  • THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. SAMUEL GARCIAWrit of Habeas Corpus document preview
  • THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. SAMUEL GARCIAWrit of Habeas Corpus document preview
  • THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. SAMUEL GARCIAWrit of Habeas Corpus document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NUMBER: 21-0547-C ‘ THE STATE 0F TEXAS § IN THE 241“ JUDICIAL vs. § DISTIELQEDZGQEJBEQEB 33 SAMUEL GARCIA § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS Sivan-é »::::«::i_.:.-.;::;:' ORDER On April 15, 2021, came on to be considered the Defendant’s Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the above styled and numbered cause. Applicant was arrested for the offense of Aggravated Robbery, a First Degree Felony, bond set at $1,000,000.00. Article 17.15 Code of Criminal Procedure, Rules for Fixing Amount of Bail, provides. that the Judge is to be governed in the exercise of the discretion by the Constitution and the following rules set out as follows: 1. The bail shall be sufficiently high to give reasonable assurance that the undertaking will be complied with 2. The power to require bail is not be so used as to make it an instrument of oppression. 3. The nature of the offense and the circumstance under which it was committed 4. The ability to make bail is to be regarded, and proof may be taken upon this point. 5. The future safety of the victim of the alleged offense and the community shall be considered. The Court has reviewed State’s Exhibits “B—1” and “B-2), offense reports admitted into evidence, considered testimony presented in the bond hearing, and weighed the factors pursuant to Article 17. 15 Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex Parz‘e Cardenas, 557 S.W.3d 722, 733 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2018, no pet.) (potential punishment and nature of offense are primary factors to be considered in assessing reasonableness of bail). Exparte Castellanos, 420 S.W. 3d 878, 883 (Tex.App-Houston [14m Dist.] 2014, no pet.). “To Show that he is unable to make bail, a defendant generally must show that his funds and his family’s funds have been exhausted. The accused’s ability to make bond is merely one factor to be considered in determining the appropriate amount of bond.” Montalvo v. State, 315 S.W.3d 588, 592—93 (Tex.App.-Houston [15‘Dist.] 2010, no pet.). “A defendant carries the burden of proof to establish that bail is excessive”. It is Hereby ORDERED that the Defendant’s Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby DENIED. Accordingly, bail is hereby continued in the amount of $1,000,000.00 Surety Bond with conditions. SIGNED AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2021. 2 .2; SKEEN, JR., Judge District Court ' uth County, Texas